Contest - mirusevxs33 (Theo mirusevxs33)
Mức sinh lời : | +0.0% |
Mức sụt vốn | 24.25% |
Pip: | 2191.4 |
Giao dịch | 312 |
Đã thắng: |
|
Thua: |
|
Loại: | Demo |
Đòn bẩy: | 1:100 |
Giao dịch: | Tự động |
Edit Your Comment
Contest - mirusevxs33Thảo luận
Tham gia từ Apr 07, 2011
72bài viết
Sep 06, 2011 at 20:58
Tham gia từ Apr 07, 2011
72bài viết
lol... like you would share a successfully working EA..... Do your own work.
Freeloader...
Freeloader...
"Taking responsibility is the cornerstone to a winning attitude"
Sep 06, 2011 at 23:50
Tham gia từ Oct 06, 2010
1bài viết
@mirusevxs33 impressive results, does your EA run on a VPS or at home office ?
Tham gia từ May 10, 2010
382bài viết
Sep 07, 2011 at 01:08
Tham gia từ May 10, 2010
382bài viết
marty posted:
I also invite everyone else to look through my comment history.. there's no conspiracy talk.. however, you will find that I'm well aware of market structure and regulations within the forex world. Think about that.
Actually, you have no clue marty...
Let the cow fly miru!! I do it every day on live accounts 😎
forex_trader_36599
Tham gia từ May 13, 2011
1341bài viết
Sep 07, 2011 at 01:22
Tham gia từ May 13, 2011
1341bài viết
I am currently working on a similiar project for 6 months.
my logic is based on 2 brokers and hedged trades.
the main algo is same. Math.
everthing is good on demo. but when you go live,
- latency
- broker order execution speed
- old ticks
- requotes on DD
- slippage on STP or STP/ECN
- VDP setups on broker side
are the main problems.
on the other hand if you do it that frequent and with average 1-5m trade time you have the smoking gun in your hand.
you will be caught by the broker soon. and if you lucky you can get back your equity. or your order execution speed on broker side will be higher then 2-5 secs.
ıf you feel yourself lucky that not caught yet do not worry it will happen.
there are solutions for all those but need hard work. 😄
regards
walker
my logic is based on 2 brokers and hedged trades.
the main algo is same. Math.
everthing is good on demo. but when you go live,
- latency
- broker order execution speed
- old ticks
- requotes on DD
- slippage on STP or STP/ECN
- VDP setups on broker side
are the main problems.
on the other hand if you do it that frequent and with average 1-5m trade time you have the smoking gun in your hand.
you will be caught by the broker soon. and if you lucky you can get back your equity. or your order execution speed on broker side will be higher then 2-5 secs.
ıf you feel yourself lucky that not caught yet do not worry it will happen.
there are solutions for all those but need hard work. 😄
regards
walker
Tham gia từ Apr 22, 2010
123bài viết
Sep 07, 2011 at 03:42
Tham gia từ Apr 22, 2010
123bài viết
Thanks to all supporting me :) Am always glad when I meet joy...
@Steve, that is not the case, it is not good only on demo.
@ForexPro, Thanks! :)
@Rob, the second is true... no vps
@ijkuwari, sorry!
@Splexin, yeah, it is fully automated, just looking it few times a day.
@Will, sure, I do it... look max lot ... of 20 .... pffff
@benji, am not sure what you ask to do...?
@Dominic, Thanks! and for the dime too :)
@uriyaz, nope, sorry and thanks for the joy :)
Wish you best! :)
@Steve, that is not the case, it is not good only on demo.
@ForexPro, Thanks! :)
@Rob, the second is true... no vps
@ijkuwari, sorry!
@Splexin, yeah, it is fully automated, just looking it few times a day.
@Will, sure, I do it... look max lot ... of 20 .... pffff
@benji, am not sure what you ask to do...?
@Dominic, Thanks! and for the dime too :)
@uriyaz, nope, sorry and thanks for the joy :)
Wish you best! :)
Tham gia từ Jun 27, 2011
30bài viết
Sep 07, 2011 at 06:24
Tham gia từ Jun 27, 2011
30bài viết
hey miru, your bot is really good. at that rate, i suppose u r already a millionaire????😉
Tham gia từ Jun 27, 2011
30bài viết
Sep 07, 2011 at 06:24
Tham gia từ Jun 27, 2011
30bài viết
just a suggestion. y not after this competition (to be fair), make your bot for sale. charge a $500 at least for it. all of us in the competition would have realise its ability already. n u would hv a at least a potential 1000++ clients. imagine hw much u would hv made man. haf a mill?? haha i m dreamig am i?😉
Tham gia từ Jul 31, 2009
1449bài viết
Sep 07, 2011 at 07:14
Tham gia từ Jul 31, 2009
1449bài viết
<b>Guys, please note that this account has been disqualified from the contest as it's clearly seen that it is benefiting from price latency, specifically that of a demo platform.
Thanks.</b>
Thanks.</b>
Tham gia từ Apr 22, 2010
123bài viết
Sep 07, 2011 at 08:08
Tham gia từ Apr 22, 2010
123bài viết
well... :)
I always presume that some reputation matters and acting just upon an assumption without giving *any* clues about, would be funny if it was not just sad.
Even the account is disabled by GoMarkets so even no statements - so, wonder who hide something...?
Disqualified upon an assumption ....may drive some negative reputation, right? Not to me btw :)
So, good luck GoMarkets! You do not like scalping, it is obvious! :)
I always presume that some reputation matters and acting just upon an assumption without giving *any* clues about, would be funny if it was not just sad.
Even the account is disabled by GoMarkets so even no statements - so, wonder who hide something...?
Disqualified upon an assumption ....may drive some negative reputation, right? Not to me btw :)
So, good luck GoMarkets! You do not like scalping, it is obvious! :)
forex_trader_17053
Tham gia từ Aug 21, 2010
11bài viết
Sep 07, 2011 at 08:16
Tham gia từ Aug 21, 2010
11bài viết
Staff posted:
<b>Guys, please note that this account has been disqualified from the contest as it's clearly seen that it is benefiting from price latency, specifically that of a demo platform.
Thanks.</b>
Clearly seen? Where is the proof of your statement/claim?
Without putting facts on the table your statement is utter worthless and a disqualification more than questionable...
Tham gia từ Apr 15, 2011
179bài viết
Sep 07, 2011 at 08:43
Tham gia từ Apr 15, 2011
179bài viết
Sep 07, 2011 at 23:15
(đã sửa Sep 07, 2011 at 23:22)
Tham gia từ Mar 15, 2011
2bài viết
<span class='quotes'>expat1967 posted: <br> <b>Clearly seen? Where is the proof of your statement/claim?
Without putting facts on the table your statement is utter worthless and a disqualification more than questionable...</b><br>
Totally agree. You state 'clearly seen' so kindly qualify your findings rather than assume we accept your findings on the basis that you are staff. This is totally out of order, so afford us the information and allow us to make judgements based on facts !
Without putting facts on the table your statement is utter worthless and a disqualification more than questionable...</b><br>
Totally agree. You state 'clearly seen' so kindly qualify your findings rather than assume we accept your findings on the basis that you are staff. This is totally out of order, so afford us the information and allow us to make judgements based on facts !
Tham gia từ Apr 22, 2010
27bài viết
Sep 07, 2011 at 23:21
Tham gia từ Apr 22, 2010
27bài viết
It's not out of order at all.. GoMarkets made the call, not staff. The 'clearly' part is in his trade history if you need proof.
Never trade for the sake of trading. Instead, wait for the trades where you have a clear advantage and exploit it.
Sep 07, 2011 at 23:37
Tham gia từ Mar 15, 2011
2bài viết
Well marty.... it would seem that appropriation of statements should be merited based on factual evidence. So here's your chance to educate novices such as I who would like proof of your claim. Also appreciate that my cynicism is based on one of the tall poppy syndromes, so common place in the trading arena, so please do not interpret my challenge as any more than a chance to explore your findings and learn. I am looking forward to this show of 'history' that demonstrates this.
J Pratt
J Pratt
Tham gia từ Jul 23, 2010
70bài viết
Sep 08, 2011 at 01:26
Tham gia từ Jul 23, 2010
70bài viết
He simply exploited the fact that a demo platform allows for executions that would not be executed in a live money trading platform.
go with the flow; just be on the right end of the wave
Tham gia từ Apr 22, 2010
27bài viết
Sep 08, 2011 at 02:20
(đã sửa Sep 08, 2011 at 02:21)
Tham gia từ Apr 22, 2010
27bài viết
prattpot posted:
Well marty.... it would seem that appropriation of statements should be merited based on factual evidence. So here's your chance to educate novices such as I who would like proof of your claim. Also appreciate that my cynicism is based on one of the tall poppy syndromes, so common place in the trading arena, so please do not interpret my challenge as any more than a chance to explore your findings and learn. I am looking forward to this show of 'history' that demonstrates this.
J Pratt
Let's backup for a moment.
I want to address something first and foremost. It's not my place, nor my responsibility to educate anyone here on these boards.
The demanding nature most people take on when participating on online trading forums, to me, serves as a vile poison to the online community. Further to that, it greatly perplexes me that people dare to take a side in such matters without understanding the true underlying issue... It had nothing to do with this account preforming 'too well' vs the others. As you pointed out with the mention of tall poppy syndrome, you might believe this happened all over the account doing too well.. but if that's the case, then your world is being viewed through greed coloured glasses.
GoMarkets didn't cut this account down because it had the most monopoly money, that's just silly.
Ask yourself, why would GoMarkets disqualify someone from a demo contest? There's no monetary difference to them, at the end of the contest they will be paying out the same prize money. Right now, other contestants have reached near or greater results than this account, but they are left untouched.. what makes this account so special to be singled out? ...it wasn't real money being made after all.
The real problem here was 'how' it was being made.
You see, this shady contestant wasn't trading against the market, but instead using an exploit in the demo account and price feed to take quick but 'fake' profits.
The contestant used a method of trading against market making (MM) brokers and applied it to the demo contest. I posted earlier about this and I'll reiterate:
How it works is simple:
1 - The exploiter starts by signing up to a quote service to get real time price updates from multiple sources in the market, and ties this into his EA running on GoMarket's MT4.
2 - Market price for a given currency pair moves a few pips suddenly.
3 - The exploiter's EA realizes that GoMarket's quote hasn't adjusted to the new price, and opens a trade that will be profitable once the price change has been realized by GoMarket's quote feed.
4 - The trade is then closed within seconds to book profits. Often these profits are only a fraction of a pip since the delay in price feed and differences in quotes is often quite small.
The contestant's particular EA goes a step further and uses the small price advantage as the opening of his trade, sometimes letting a profitable trade run for a few pips in a profitable direction before closing.
This is a huge problem for brokers who act as a market maker since they'll never have a chance to hedge their side of the trade... any system they have to hedge their risk fails since the market would have already moved off quote from the price they delivered the client. That being said, nearly all brokers who act as a market maker have a system setup to catch and eject people trying to exploit them (it's all too common to see threads start up in forums about brokers who refuse to pay out profits but give the initial deposits back to an offending client.. these are usually related lag/price-delay trading.)
How to tell if someone is exploiting price delays is quite simple:
- Average duration is in the seconds, some as short as 1 second.
- Despite the second(s) long duration, the profit realized in such short time frames is substantial.
- Putting these two points together...just run the probabilities that an account can cleanly catch 10+ pip moves within a second's time to open and close a given trade, and do so on a consistent bases with a 90%+ win percentage. It becomes statistically impossible.
GoMarkets won't have this problem on live accounts since they are an STP broker. This is a problem that plagues market makers. Since this is a demo contest however, the demo platform is susceptible to such exploits.
Never trade for the sake of trading. Instead, wait for the trades where you have a clear advantage and exploit it.
Tham gia từ Apr 22, 2010
27bài viết
Sep 08, 2011 at 02:33
(đã sửa Sep 08, 2011 at 02:36)
Tham gia từ Apr 22, 2010
27bài viết
All that being said, I hope thing brings you to the realization that this contestant was robbing each and every other contest participant of a chance to place high in the rankings on trading skill. Had he taken first (as was his placement before being cut out of the contest) he was robbing 2nd place of 1st place's prize money.
Further, his trade results would just confuse the people looking to learn from the analytic studies of his account long after the contest is over... (which if you haven't already done so, check out the winners of the past contests and see their trade records. Its a great resource and gives you an idea of how profitable people trade.)
The spirit of this contest is about trading.. not exploiting a glitch in the price feed.
... I don't mean to come off so harsh, but do understand how infuriating it is to be questioned by the people who'll benefit the most from his person's ejection from the contest. It's not even logical why some people will defend him, demand evidence that's available right in his trade records, and even ask to buy his EA off him... but then again, when greed is involved logic can go out the window.
That's it, I'm done with this topic.. if you want to know more, do some research on price delay (lag) trading and how they plague market makers.
Further, his trade results would just confuse the people looking to learn from the analytic studies of his account long after the contest is over... (which if you haven't already done so, check out the winners of the past contests and see their trade records. Its a great resource and gives you an idea of how profitable people trade.)
The spirit of this contest is about trading.. not exploiting a glitch in the price feed.
... I don't mean to come off so harsh, but do understand how infuriating it is to be questioned by the people who'll benefit the most from his person's ejection from the contest. It's not even logical why some people will defend him, demand evidence that's available right in his trade records, and even ask to buy his EA off him... but then again, when greed is involved logic can go out the window.
That's it, I'm done with this topic.. if you want to know more, do some research on price delay (lag) trading and how they plague market makers.
Never trade for the sake of trading. Instead, wait for the trades where you have a clear advantage and exploit it.
Tham gia từ Apr 22, 2010
123bài viết
Sep 08, 2011 at 04:49
Tham gia từ Apr 22, 2010
123bài viết
lol 'this shady contestant' :)
'check out the winners of the past contests and see their trade records' - are you serious??? do you really advise novice traders to learn from there? do you do/did that :))))
'That's it, I'm done with this topic..' - oh, really? you like to do that on daily basis :)
giving homework to other, try to do it himself first... you are with feelings that you know brokerages and how they work, but for sure you know no more than advertisings :)
but enough with free advises, you may deserve it, but i have no time for that :)
good luck
'check out the winners of the past contests and see their trade records' - are you serious??? do you really advise novice traders to learn from there? do you do/did that :))))
'That's it, I'm done with this topic..' - oh, really? you like to do that on daily basis :)
giving homework to other, try to do it himself first... you are with feelings that you know brokerages and how they work, but for sure you know no more than advertisings :)
but enough with free advises, you may deserve it, but i have no time for that :)
good luck
Sep 08, 2011 at 06:06
Tham gia từ Sep 07, 2009
7bài viết
Well mirusevxs33, I'm curious about something.... You're profile shows a trade record with 310,000 % in a month. From 10K to 32million. Are you saying that those are all fair trades with no latent/lag trading advantage ??
If lag trading were allowed, there would be no contest, because everyone would attempt to create artificial trade programs to try and 'win' a couple grand trading account.
I'm not trying to upset you, but I agree with the mods.
If lag trading were allowed, there would be no contest, because everyone would attempt to create artificial trade programs to try and 'win' a couple grand trading account.
I'm not trying to upset you, but I agree with the mods.
*Nghiêm cấm sử dụng cho mục đích thương mại và spam, nếu vi phạm có thể dẫn đến việc chấm dứt tài khoản.
Mẹo: Đăng ảnh/url youtube sẽ tự động được nhúng vào bài viết của bạn!
Mẹo: Dùng @ để tự động điền tên người dùng tham gia vào cuộc thảo luận này.