Realistically Managed Accounts (Theo forex_trader_42159)
Người dùng đã xóa hệ thống này.
Edit Your Comment
Realistically Managed AccountsThảo luận
forex_trader_42159
Tham gia từ Jul 19, 2011
8bài viết
Aug 01, 2011 at 18:01
(đã sửa Aug 01, 2011 at 18:24)
Tham gia từ Jul 19, 2011
8bài viết
Hello,
I offer managed account services. It took about 5 years to perfect and come up with the current trading plan that I have now.
My monthly target return is NOT double digits %.
If you want double digits % return/month, I'm sorry but I can't offer this and this is why:
It would mean to take huge risks to attain double digits returns/month. The problem is that is not sustainable over the long term. Because even if I would be very careful about how I trade, the high leverage that I have to take in order to make double digits return/month would expose me to the so called 'fat tails' in the market.
We know that the market distribution is NOT Normal/Gaussian, in fact is the opposite, it exhibit many 'fat tails' and the next fat tail can be around the corner. This is why a robust Risk Management plan is required.
And yes, that ' x%risk / trade ' rule is nonsense. To preserve capital and in the same time have profits over the long term, it is mandatory to have a very complex risk management plan. Why? A complex one(once the errors eliminated from the model) take in consideration many more variables and helps the manager(me) to know what is the risk that I have on the market. Of course, we can't put faith 100% in this mathematical model to quantify the risk, instead I also use my experience as a 'Risk trader' to know when should I trust the math models and when not.
Why did I emphasized so much about risk? Because I see a lot of 'managers' here who think that they could provide double digits(over 10%) per month and if an investors invest with them, of course they will loose the investors money because over 10%/month is NOT sustainable over the long term. I guarantee 100% that is going to fail over the long term if double digits are wanted.
If you are investor who want realistically returns and want to discuss further, you can send me an email at the address below or go to my website.
I offer managed account services. It took about 5 years to perfect and come up with the current trading plan that I have now.
My monthly target return is NOT double digits %.
If you want double digits % return/month, I'm sorry but I can't offer this and this is why:
It would mean to take huge risks to attain double digits returns/month. The problem is that is not sustainable over the long term. Because even if I would be very careful about how I trade, the high leverage that I have to take in order to make double digits return/month would expose me to the so called 'fat tails' in the market.
We know that the market distribution is NOT Normal/Gaussian, in fact is the opposite, it exhibit many 'fat tails' and the next fat tail can be around the corner. This is why a robust Risk Management plan is required.
And yes, that ' x%risk / trade ' rule is nonsense. To preserve capital and in the same time have profits over the long term, it is mandatory to have a very complex risk management plan. Why? A complex one(once the errors eliminated from the model) take in consideration many more variables and helps the manager(me) to know what is the risk that I have on the market. Of course, we can't put faith 100% in this mathematical model to quantify the risk, instead I also use my experience as a 'Risk trader' to know when should I trust the math models and when not.
Why did I emphasized so much about risk? Because I see a lot of 'managers' here who think that they could provide double digits(over 10%) per month and if an investors invest with them, of course they will loose the investors money because over 10%/month is NOT sustainable over the long term. I guarantee 100% that is going to fail over the long term if double digits are wanted.
If you are investor who want realistically returns and want to discuss further, you can send me an email at the address below or go to my website.
forex_trader_8139
Tham gia từ Mar 04, 2010
423bài viết
Aug 19, 2011 at 07:47
Tham gia từ Mar 04, 2010
423bài viết
This is well said. Consistency over long term is the key point here.
Cheers,
SIM
Cheers,
SIM
forex_trader_42159
Tham gia từ Jul 19, 2011
8bài viết
Aug 23, 2011 at 20:47
(đã sửa Aug 23, 2011 at 20:47)
Tham gia từ Jul 19, 2011
8bài viết
SIM,
Yes, you are right. We shouldn't focus too much over the short term, instead the focus should be over the long term.
Because the real distribution of returns are not shown in the short term. The real distribution appear over the long term.
.
Yes, you are right. We shouldn't focus too much over the short term, instead the focus should be over the long term.
Because the real distribution of returns are not shown in the short term. The real distribution appear over the long term.
.
Aug 24, 2011 at 20:28
Tham gia từ Aug 18, 2011
6bài viết
Hi Reverse,
I completely agree with you. I just found this page today, and the last 9 systems I've looked at on myfxbook were complete rubbish. Massive percentage gains, but a massive and unacceptable risk of ruin. Some even had negative pips, which means they are long term losers, guaranteed.
I came to fx from an online poker hobby, so thankfully I understand a lot about how short term gains are completely misleading, even if you have hundreds of trades (Poker is even more volatile than trading, and risk management is key to survival).
Oddly enough, the myfxbook analysis on 'risk of ruin' seems incredibly flawed.
More power to you, and thank you for posting an actually viable system with long term positive expected value.
me7062a
I completely agree with you. I just found this page today, and the last 9 systems I've looked at on myfxbook were complete rubbish. Massive percentage gains, but a massive and unacceptable risk of ruin. Some even had negative pips, which means they are long term losers, guaranteed.
I came to fx from an online poker hobby, so thankfully I understand a lot about how short term gains are completely misleading, even if you have hundreds of trades (Poker is even more volatile than trading, and risk management is key to survival).
Oddly enough, the myfxbook analysis on 'risk of ruin' seems incredibly flawed.
More power to you, and thank you for posting an actually viable system with long term positive expected value.
me7062a
*Nghiêm cấm sử dụng cho mục đích thương mại và spam, nếu vi phạm có thể dẫn đến việc chấm dứt tài khoản.
Mẹo: Đăng ảnh/url youtube sẽ tự động được nhúng vào bài viết của bạn!
Mẹo: Dùng @ để tự động điền tên người dùng tham gia vào cuộc thảo luận này.