Discusión Vergil_UWC

$100, 000 REAL MONEY if you wish to trade your Algorithm -If you have a trading system and never tested live or not enough as mechanical trading system send me your own evaluations and I will fiance this business.I don't want to see any reports or buy any algorithm ,I am just interested to finance the people witch lost years in testing and have a good idea and or a system .

We need a partner and we have the $100, 000 and if you wish to trade a mechanical futures trading system send us your evaluations.

I want to find a good trading and give the opportunity for the owner to trade with 100.000 $ Capital . So it becomes necessary to distinguishing good systems from the rest of the existing trading systems . Fortunately, there is a way to do this by using a set of criteria that I believe must be met in order for you to consider using the system and do/perform real trade with real money .In case you are one of the the people have such a system send your own evaluations and I will contact you for discussing conditions and details .

1.
Mechanical System: The trading system must be 100% mechanical without any human input or overrides. It must also not be tweaked or adjusted as time goes on to fit current data. Also, the system algorithms or rules must not be curve-fitting or tailored to short term, non-repetitive patterns of past data that eliminate otherwise losing trades. A good way to screen for curve-fitting is to look for consistently good results over a minimum of 5 years of past data that meet all of the other criteria outlined in this report as well.

2.
Markets: The trading system should be aimed at liquid markets where sufficient daily volume exists to easily and consistently execute orders as intended by the system with a minimum of slippage. For example, Forex, Index Futures Market ,Options . . ..

3.
Market Direction Independence: It should have the potential to generate successful trading performance in all market conditions; bull, bear, and sideways trading range.

4.
Hypothetical Performance Results: The primary way of evaluating a trading system is based on its historical back tested performance (hypothetical performance). But the performance record must include real world trading commission and slippage assumptions. Commission and slippage can cause an otherwise winning performance to actually be a net loser. Beware of any futures trading system performance data where commission and slippage assumptions are not included or are understated.

5.
Maximum Drawdown: There are two aspects to consider; the dollar amount of the drawdown as a percentage of the total account value (should not exceed of the average annual return) and the duration of the drawdown until a new peak level in equity is realized (should not exceed 1 months

6.
Beginning Account Size: The maximum past drawdown (over a minimum five year back testing period) plus the margin required for one contract is the absolute minimum account size required to trade a system. And to be conservative, it is prudent to add a buffer since the maximum drawdown for any trading system is always in the future.

7.
Annual Returns: Annual returns are measured as net profit after commissions and slippage, divided by the beginning account size which gives you annual percent return on beginning account size. Two things are important here. First, the average annual net profit should be a minimum of twice the maximum drawdown over a period of at least 5 years backtracking/testing . Second, ideally there should be no losing years.

8.
Trade Profile: There are two aspects important here. First, the percent of profitable trades should be in the 20-X0% range and the ratio of average win to average loss should be in the 1.3 - 2.0 Risk : Reward range ratio .

9. Just send you own evaluations as it is .

We don't want to sell or promote any broker or trading system we just finance the people & system as a business .
Thanks
Aurel Ispas