EAKAIN AGGRESSIVE ACTIVTRADES INTERBANK (bei besteaforex)
Gewinn : | +404.47% |
Drawdown | 29.73% |
Pips: | 1112.0 |
Trades | 422 |
Gewonnen: |
|
Verloren: |
|
Typ: | Demo |
Hebel: | 1:100 |
Trading: | Automatisiert |
Edit Your Comment
EAKAIN AGGRESSIVE ACTIVTRADES INTERBANK Diskussion
Mitglied seit Oct 28, 2009
1430 Posts
Feb 25, 2010 at 15:05
Mitglied seit Oct 28, 2009
1430 Posts
In equity terms what exactly does risk 30 mean?
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Mitglied seit Feb 14, 2010
4 Posts
Mitglied seit Oct 28, 2009
1430 Posts
Feb 25, 2010 at 15:10
Mitglied seit Oct 28, 2009
1430 Posts
So, on a full stop loss you're going to lose 30% of your capital?
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Mitglied seit Sep 04, 2009
879 Posts
Mar 27, 2010 at 14:49
(bearbeitet Mar 27, 2010 at 14:53)
Mitglied seit Sep 04, 2009
879 Posts
Actually, I see no great future for all these, to the Asian session limited, scalpers.
Since hundred of thousands wannabe 'traders' jump with their purchased EAs on the 'lets the shit scalp out of the Asians' bandwagon, we see more often (false) breakouts and higher volatility as usual. Brokers and other big dogs ain't goofies.
That's the reason why all the sellers of these EAs have to adjust and update their products almost on a weekly basis. Its a rat race against the time 😁
The solid scalper systems work on all sessions under all circumstances. They do exist, they just don't get published. They are expensive...
Since hundred of thousands wannabe 'traders' jump with their purchased EAs on the 'lets the shit scalp out of the Asians' bandwagon, we see more often (false) breakouts and higher volatility as usual. Brokers and other big dogs ain't goofies.
That's the reason why all the sellers of these EAs have to adjust and update their products almost on a weekly basis. Its a rat race against the time 😁
The solid scalper systems work on all sessions under all circumstances. They do exist, they just don't get published. They are expensive...
Mar 28, 2010 at 15:10
Mitglied seit Mar 07, 2010
257 Posts
pc8multifx posted:I agree however most of these EAs run on bucketshops so it's a question whether the bucketshops send the orders to the market ...
Actually, I see no great future for all these, to the Asian session limited, scalpers.
Since hundred of thousands wannabe 'traders' jump with their purchased EAs on the 'lets the shit scalp out of the Asians' bandwagon, we see more often (false) breakouts and higher volatility as usual. Brokers and other big dogs ain't goofies.
If they do then it depends probably it has to build to a couple billions a day/week for the big boys to get interested ...
and that connected with lower liquidity during Asian session might mean spikes that will take all those EAs out ...
on the other hand you think there are hundreds of the EAs being sold by the EA makers ?
Mitglied seit Sep 04, 2009
879 Posts
Mar 28, 2010 at 15:42
Mitglied seit Sep 04, 2009
879 Posts
Hundreds? LOL Think about the fapturbo hype... more than 50.000 times sold
All these commercial EAs get cracked and sold on eBay for low money.. that's why I'm sure an enormous amount of traders are riding the Asian session scalper wave
All these commercial EAs get cracked and sold on eBay for low money.. that's why I'm sure an enormous amount of traders are riding the Asian session scalper wave
Apr 10, 2010 at 13:57
Mitglied seit Apr 04, 2010
16 Posts
Mitglied seit Apr 13, 2010
83 Posts
*Kommerzielle Nutzung und Spam werden nicht toleriert und können zur Kündigung des Kontos führen.
Tipp: Wenn Sie ein Bild/eine Youtube-Url posten, wird diese automatisch in Ihren Beitrag eingebettet!
Tipp: Tippen Sie das @-Zeichen ein, um einen an dieser Diskussion teilnehmenden Benutzernamen automatisch zu vervollständigen.