正在加载...
继续访问Myfxbook.com
继续访问Myfxbook.com
Čeština
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Indonesia
Latviešu
Melayu
Polski
Português(Brasil)
Português(Portugal)
Slovenčina
Svenska
Türkçe
Vietnamese
Русский
हिंदी
ไทย
日本語
简体字
繁體中文
한국어
登录
注册
Open an account with FOREX.com
FX Tools:
经济日历
Interest Rates
FX Calculators
新闻
价差
情绪
外汇热力图
相关性
Market Hours
首页
pipdetector
帖子
分享
分享此页面！
Advertisement
帖子作者：
pipdetector
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
Random or not?
在
一般
中
Mar 18, 2011 at 09:17
It's been a long story... There always have two sides on the market during transaction. Assuming that they both have the same TA tools there should not be any transactions, because why should anyone sell if the TA "says" that the price will go up? But when you start adding different time frames and position sizes this gets more and more complicated. The number of possible factors that influences the price (especially in short term) grows exponentially... My current stance is -- price movements are random short term, if you have a system you need to take care of proper position si...
Compuforex Jade Live
在
交易系统
中
Mar 17, 2011 at 14:58
Well, you can look at it another way: how lucky you were that you withdrew the bulk of your money earlier...
FLASH MOVEMENTS 2011-03-16 5pm EST
在
一般
中
Mar 17, 2011 at 14:35
I do not think so, the guess the key reasons were breach of multiyear lows USD/JPY, heavy orders inbalance and extremely thin trading. The other pairs simply were ripples on this pair.I was glued to the screen yesterday too, this was a real show. The last time I saw something similar was May 2010...
Reliability EA (2nd Test)
在
交易系统
中
Feb 28, 2011 at 08:07
What is the difference between the EA's settings in the first and the second test?
PFR - FXPro
在
交易系统
中
Feb 03, 2011 at 22:07
I am not at home not, so I cannot tell for sure, but definitely I have noticed that some trades are without the comment. I also have noticed some more erratic behavior. One of the most "strange" was when I manually assigned the amounts for each of the martingale level and PFR used to open the first of the trades (PROFX_0) at 2.5x the original value that I assigned. Some other strange things: sometimes PFR opened two trades at the same time one with a comment and the other without. This is acceptable with the low martingale level, but if this happened at PROFX_6 then the account could...
Reliability EA 2.0
在
交易系统
中
Jan 12, 2011 at 08:15
Indeed, it seems that starting it with anything then 10000$ seems quite risky. Unless the System takes into account the equity size and opens new positions at much lower rates.
FXDD
在
经纪人
中
Dec 21, 2010 at 12:03
Definitely spreads are not their strongest point
Jim - Live IBFX
在
交易系统
中
Dec 15, 2010 at 14:29
I am concerned about trading all four pairs as they are all USD linked. So there is a remote posibility if all 4 pairs were very volatile that you may get 4x bigger drawdown. I use the conservative settings and although I had a couple setbacks on USDCHF recently, but I do not complain.Here is the PFR only accounthttp://www.myfxbook.com/members/pipdetector/pfr-fxpro/37632The other used mix of EAs (Megadroid and Probability 7.0 for a while, now it is PFR only -- MD was OK with PFR, but Probability could not coexist with PFR at all).http://www.myfxbook.com/members/pipdetector/pfrprobability-atc/3...
Probability EA 7.1.2
在
交易系统
中
Dec 01, 2010 at 11:16
I wonder why the spacing has been changed from 10 to 80...
Reliability EA 2.0
在
交易系统
中
Nov 24, 2010 at 20:46
Mostly automated using ProForexRobot, Megadroid, GT-Shadow and Pipstrider. I am testing Probability 7.0 and maybe I will include it in my toolbox next month. Reliability 2.0 seems a bit expensive, backtests seem a bit dubious, because you cannot test them on your own even if you bought the EA. I do not feel up to parting with $1000 to test Reliability to find out that it does not work as "advertised"...
Reliability EA 2.0
在
交易系统
中
Nov 24, 2010 at 15:47
Unfortunately, you cannot back test the EA (this is the biggest drawdown that keeps me from considering it as a buy). I wonder when the EA will start closing the present open positions.
Reliability EA 2.0
在
交易系统
中
Nov 24, 2010 at 15:24
Interesting results...
Trading without Stoploss, can send you packing
在
经验丰富的交易员
中
Nov 12, 2010 at 14:31
Setting stop loss seems not necessary if you are consistent in your strategy and you play with very small lots relative to your account equity eg. if you have $5000 account and you play with 0.01 lots.
PipStrider-Live
在
交易系统
中
Sep 17, 2010 at 19:19
Aggressive strategy assumes increased risk for potentially better returns. My strategy is to start most aggressive at the beginning when the stake is the lowest and then gradually ease it off. Eg. I set the BalanceFactor to 1000 in the beginning, but I changed it to 1500 recently and I will continue it until it gets to 2500. I will leave it at that then.
PipStrider-Live
在
交易系统
中
Sep 17, 2010 at 16:35
Thanks for sharing. I will think about setting ExpandPips2 to 100 -- it makes sense especially when Aggressive settings are used. Quite a loss on the swaps... I thought that this must have been something irregular, because if you exceeded level 7 the loss would have been massive and this was just a hiccup.
PipStrider-Live
在
交易系统
中
Sep 16, 2010 at 11:27
Did you hit 7 or 8 martingale level? I am also interested in which settings you use.Here are my PipStrider results. I guess I missed the June loss by sheer luck.http://www.myfxbook.com/members/pipdetector/ps-fxdd/37870
4xGreed
在
交易系统
中
Sep 07, 2010 at 12:18
BTW, maybe 4xGreed was a sophisticated ploy to drive potential customers to Dominic -- additional publicity + he claims that he offers the genuine "expert". Hell of a cheek. The most vexing is that with the other EA of which a lot are scams too, you can at least get the money thru ClickBank or Plimus...
4xGreed
在
交易系统
中
Sep 07, 2010 at 12:04
ruht03,There was something fishy in it the first I checked the "superrobot". The funny thing is that 4xGreed seems to be a "pirated" version of the "EA". The fact that SuperFxRobot was a scam was the reason why Dominic did not take any legal action against the other guys. I am glad that I have lost only 65 USD buying a 30 days trial on 4xGreed...
Jim - Live IBFX
在
交易系统
中
Sep 07, 2010 at 09:48
Hi there,I am also running PFR. I am bit surprised by the position sizes that are shown with myfxbook here. It seems that they actually are 0.01 lot not 0.1 as shown in the statements. Probably myfxbook has problems with nanolots...Anyway, your results seem pretty consistent with what I get and I think they are pretty encouraging. When I go live, I will trade EUR/USD and USD/JPY first and then I will add the other two pairs.
Arbatov System
在
交易系统
中
Sep 03, 2010 at 10:22
For the man in the FX street the problem is how to separate the wheat from the chaff... (genuine EAs, genuine forex signals, genuine results...).But foremostly, the problem lies in ourselves, even if we are given really good trading method -- it need to be "tailor made" for us. In FX market only one thing is sure that nothing is sure: we keep forgetting it on the quest for the Holy Grail. It is convenient to have some "scape goat" to blame whenever something goes wrong...
You have an Ad Blocker!
Myfxbook is a site supported by advertisements. Here are two ways for you to continue browsing:
Ad Free Subscription
或
Disable your Ad Blocker
Already subscribed?
登录
您没有登录
此功能仅适用于注册会员。
注册是免费的，只需不到一分钟。
点击注册按钮继续。
除非您已经是会员并享受我们的服务，否则只需登录。
Keep up to date with the markets
Enable notifications to receive real-time important market updates:
经济日历
外汇新闻
You can disable notifications at any time from your browser.
Unblock Notifications
You've blocked browser notifications for Myfxbook.com. Please enable it:
You can disable notifications at any time from your browser.
以前
共识
实际
