Volatility Factor - Alpari Real
ผู้ใช้ได้ลบระบบนี้
Volatility Factor - Alpari Real การสนทนา
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 16, 2010
453 โพสต์
Mar 28, 2012 at 06:03
looks cool
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Apr 25, 2011
262 โพสต์
Mar 28, 2012 at 10:09
(แก้ไขแล้ว Mar 28, 2012 at 10:10)
mistificator posted:
looks cool
The growth curve looks cool, indeed, but to me the EA suddenly looks totally not cool. Reason? Too much averaging down. See here a basket that went all the way to 8 trades:
02.16.2012 17:01 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57124 1.57554 -43.0 -25.58 5d -0.49%
02.16.2012 17:25 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57285 1.57552 -26.7 -16.29 5d -0.31%
02.16.2012 17:28 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57462 1.57552 -9.0 -6.20 5d -0.12%
02.16.2012 17:36 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57657 1.57545 11.2 5.32 5d 0.10%
02.16.2012 23:47 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57994 1.57543 45.1 24.64 5d 0.47%
02.17.2012 11:13 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.58173 1.57535 63.8 35.57 5d 0.69%
02.17.2012 11:36 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.58473 1.57526 94.7 53.18 4d 1.04%
02.20.2012 00:17 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.58615 1.57522 109.3 61.81 2d 1.22%
forex_trader_29148
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 11, 2011
1916 โพสต์
Mar 28, 2012 at 14:15
EA5918 posted:
seems another kind of Martingle ?
grid but not martingale
Mar 29, 2012 at 10:32
Experienced people know that the grid system should be tested at least 10 years of backtest. This EA has backtets only from 26/08/2008!!! I think that backtest from 2007 will account blow up. Very similar to one EA, which is free. I wonder if that you guess?
https://www.volatility-factor.com/backtests/gbpusd_0,1_lot.htm
https://www.volatility-factor.com/backtests/gbpusd_0,1_lot.htm
forex_trader_55397
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 02, 2011
51 โพสต์
Mar 29, 2012 at 11:42
piece of carp just like WSFR...
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 27, 2011
3 โพสต์
Mar 29, 2012 at 12:15
WSFR is crap? Really? And why is that? Please do tell.
forex_trader_55397
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 02, 2011
51 โพสต์
Mar 29, 2012 at 14:33
maxoverkill posted:
WSFR is crap? Really? And why is that? Please do tell.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/jd5503/wsfr/120393
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 27, 2011
3 โพสต์
Mar 29, 2012 at 21:10
That stats look nasty, but there are no informations about risk used and there are unsupported pairs. Could you give me more info about settings?
forex_trader_55397
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 02, 2011
51 โพสต์
Mar 30, 2012 at 07:18
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 27, 2011
3 โพสต์
Mar 30, 2012 at 13:04
Meta4r3x posted:
nasty? u ain't see nothing yet...here, lol 😝😝😝
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/jd5503/wsfr2/123116
He traded unsupported pairs and he played with SL. Look at his worst trade, -1323 pips. He probably used suicide mode ;)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 27, 2012
33 โพสต์
Apr 01, 2012 at 08:18
What are the settings on this Volatility Factor account?
Also, why do you not allow back-testing to before 2008?
Also, why do you not allow back-testing to before 2008?
forex_trader_32776
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 28, 2011
1008 โพสต์
Apr 01, 2012 at 12:07
NextLevelForex posted:
mistificator posted:
looks cool
The growth curve looks cool, indeed, but to me the EA suddenly looks totally not cool. Reason? Too much averaging down. See here a basket that went all the way to 8 trades:
02.16.2012 17:01 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57124 1.57554 -43.0 -25.58 5d -0.49%
02.16.2012 17:25 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57285 1.57552 -26.7 -16.29 5d -0.31%
02.16.2012 17:28 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57462 1.57552 -9.0 -6.20 5d -0.12%
02.16.2012 17:36 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57657 1.57545 11.2 5.32 5d 0.10%
02.16.2012 23:47 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57994 1.57543 45.1 24.64 5d 0.47%
02.17.2012 11:13 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.58173 1.57535 63.8 35.57 5d 0.69%
02.17.2012 11:36 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.58473 1.57526 94.7 53.18 4d 1.04%
02.20.2012 00:17 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.58615 1.57522 109.3 61.81 2d 1.22%
Remus found 8 open positions. Birt's EA Review website stated 4 positions max. Can the developer please share the details of what this strategy does.
I also noticed the recent losses, Does the EA close the positions before the weekend? Is that the reason for closing down the latest positions and not stacking more to the floating loss
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Apr 25, 2011
262 โพสต์
Apr 05, 2012 at 16:03
The max basket size is one of the EA parameters (to be precise, the parameter actually tells how many positions to open when averaging down, so it would be 7 or 3 in our case). I bet the recent close of the EURUSD basket and the fact that there are no new GPBUSD positions opened in the current basket is because they changed the basket size for this official account, from 8 to 4.
Apr 06, 2012 at 08:26
The default 'maxnegs' is 3, so it will add the original position, plus 3 more, by default. You can set this as high as you want, but in their backtests they show that 3 is the best option for least drawdown and max profitability factor. That being said, I have personally set mine to 1, so it will do initial position + 1. You can even set it to 0 if you want.
Apr 16, 2012 at 06:37
Meta4r3x posted:
nasty? u ain't see nothing yet...here, lol 😝😝😝
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/jd5503/wsfr2/123116
you are not serious when you show that as a proof to denigrate wfr?
what i like is to see bt before 2008,for me this is the the biggest turn off about that ea. only ignorant or stupid people will buy this without any more proofs
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 19, 2012
2 โพสต์
Apr 16, 2012 at 07:43
Meta4r3x posted:
piece of carp just like WSFR...
you have to know what change in WSFR to be good enough for you.
If you make many back tests you will find the answer.
WS is good if you want to have stable 5% monthly, and I am telling you, it is enough :-)
best regardst
Thomas
