FX Amplified - Nick's Account (ForexSignals.com (โดย NickMcDonald)
ผู้ใช้ได้ลบระบบนี้
FX Amplified - Nick's Account (ForexSignals.com การสนทนา
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 25, 2010
1288 โพสต์
Jun 17, 2013 at 06:31
Please provide a subscription link somewhere! I don't know how I subscribed before, but I can't seem to resubscribe!
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 05, 2011
301 โพสต์
Jun 18, 2013 at 03:24
The signal is no longer being sold. They will be putting together a PAMM account soon.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 05, 2011
301 โพสต์
Jul 04, 2013 at 14:46
Drawdown isn't looking good
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 05, 2011
301 โพสต์
Jul 09, 2013 at 14:41
I guess easy come, easy go. 😲
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Apr 22, 2010
122 โพสต์
Jul 09, 2013 at 14:42
terrible...
forex_trader_118239
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 23, 2013
21 โพสต์
Jul 11, 2013 at 06:05
July's a bad month. terrible....
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Oct 27, 2011
59 โพสต์
Jul 11, 2013 at 10:54
We finally picked up a winner today. The recovery begins :)
Find your passion and work hard
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 05, 2011
301 โพสต์
Jul 11, 2013 at 13:47
NickMcDonald posted:
We finally picked up a winner today. The recovery begins :)
I sure hope so Nick . . . there is a long way to go.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Oct 27, 2011
59 โพสต์
Jul 11, 2013 at 14:45
A second winner only 20mins ago.
I think we'll be back above watermark high within the next 3-4 weeks.
I think we'll be back above watermark high within the next 3-4 weeks.
Find your passion and work hard
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 05, 2011
301 โพสต์
Jul 16, 2013 at 15:53
Another wonderful trade . . .
Jul 16, 2013 at 19:49
Aplmustdie posted:
Another wonderful trade . . .
If this trade doesn't win I think I'll stop until new high water mark. Then I can have trust in the trader again.
5-15pip TP with 50+ SL can be 10:1 r/r and that can take a long time to recover if ever.😞
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 05, 2011
301 โพสต์
Jul 23, 2013 at 17:21
uk_max posted:
shouldn't the drawdown be about 50% and not 25%?
Your account had almost 100% gain ( $8,000 profit ) and now its near 50% gain. Only shows a 25% loss in the month of July while you missed out on 4k profit banked profit 😳
Drawdown is based on the size of the entire account, not just the profits.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Apr 22, 2010
122 โพสต์
Jul 24, 2013 at 07:54
(แก้ไขแล้ว Jul 24, 2013 at 07:58)
hold&pray
the only worse than that is "averaging"
3 months are in the bin already (that is only for those happy ppl which are from the beginning of it...)
the only worse than that is "averaging"
3 months are in the bin already (that is only for those happy ppl which are from the beginning of it...)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Apr 22, 2010
122 โพสต์
Jul 31, 2013 at 19:04
no stops? even mental....????
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 05, 2011
301 โพสต์
Aug 07, 2013 at 19:27
mirusevxs33 posted:
no stops? even mental....????
There's a stop, he just keeps moving it, 😉
forex_trader_88964
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 24, 2012
112 โพสต์
Aug 07, 2013 at 19:37
I don't understand how some people can follow you really....
Aug 07, 2013 at 20:27
Guys,
The chart looked pretty, but this drawdown was inevitable. You cant have an average loss 2x your winner. You will ultimately lose money. It means that you need to have 2 winners for very loser just to break even.
You would be better off talking fewer winners and managing your losses. A robust trading system should have the average winner greater than he average loser. If the w/l ratio was in reverse and focused on having each winner 2x each loser, then you would have a sustainable profitable system. 30% drawdown is unsustainable and will happen again using the current methods.
A small change in the w/l % will cause you to lose money under the current system. Everyone looks for the Holy Grail. Well, here it is. Focus on the average winner being greater than the average loser. Thats the Holy Grail. If your average winner was 2x your average loser, you would only need to have 33% winning trades to break even.
Thats the real deal.
The chart looked pretty, but this drawdown was inevitable. You cant have an average loss 2x your winner. You will ultimately lose money. It means that you need to have 2 winners for very loser just to break even.
You would be better off talking fewer winners and managing your losses. A robust trading system should have the average winner greater than he average loser. If the w/l ratio was in reverse and focused on having each winner 2x each loser, then you would have a sustainable profitable system. 30% drawdown is unsustainable and will happen again using the current methods.
A small change in the w/l % will cause you to lose money under the current system. Everyone looks for the Holy Grail. Well, here it is. Focus on the average winner being greater than the average loser. Thats the Holy Grail. If your average winner was 2x your average loser, you would only need to have 33% winning trades to break even.
Thats the real deal.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Apr 22, 2010
122 โพสต์
Aug 26, 2013 at 20:07
Aplmustdie posted:😲mirusevxs33 posted:
no stops? even mental....????
There's a stop, he just keeps moving it, 😉
