=EC2= (โดย Prasono)
กำไร : | +98.3M% |
ขาดทุนสะสม | 0.00% |
pips: | 5152.8 |
การเทรด | 3559 |
ได้กำไร : |
|
ขาดทุน : |
|
คุณภาพของโมเดล : | 90.0% |
Bars in test: | 109790 |
การขยับของราคาที่เกิดขึ้น : | 21603117 |
ไม่มีการทดสอบจริง
Edit Your Comment
=EC2= การสนทนา
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Oct 28, 2009
1430 โพสต์
Jun 13, 2010 at 16:58
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Oct 28, 2009
1430 โพสต์
Nice backtest, what are you risking per trade there?
Looks like about 15% on each trade. Is that right?
Looks like about 15% on each trade. Is that right?
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Jun 14, 2010 at 23:17
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jun 14, 2010
1 โพสต์
Very nice backtest,have you try on a real account, Mr. Arief? I can talk in 'Bahasa' language.
I am very newbie in forex and ea-user at demo account. I hope i can learn from you all here.
You have very good ea, Mr. Arief. Absolutely.
I am very newbie in forex and ea-user at demo account. I hope i can learn from you all here.
You have very good ea, Mr. Arief. Absolutely.
Jun 16, 2010 at 07:00
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 06, 2010
24 โพสต์
You will never get the same results live, this back test strategy section should be scrapped as I know for a fact when back testing with Alpari you are getting the spread of a Pro Account for running tests, can't open low deposits accounts on a Pro Account!😲
Suspect all brokers provide better data to use for back tests lulling us in to false sense of security without us knowing what settings are used for the back test
Suspect all brokers provide better data to use for back tests lulling us in to false sense of security without us knowing what settings are used for the back test
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Oct 28, 2009
1430 โพสต์
Jun 16, 2010 at 07:22
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Oct 28, 2009
1430 โพสต์
I think most people are aware that backtesting is flawed. There are certain things people can do to get around this. One of which is to obtain better tick data.
I think backtesting is a valid exercise and I have one rule. If it blows up in backtesting it's in the bin. If it passes backtesting then there is half a chance it might work live.
Also the smaller the pip values your EA is dealing with and the shorter the timeframe the higher the discrepancy between the backtest and live trading is likely to be.
I think backtesting is a valid exercise and I have one rule. If it blows up in backtesting it's in the bin. If it passes backtesting then there is half a chance it might work live.
Also the smaller the pip values your EA is dealing with and the shorter the timeframe the higher the discrepancy between the backtest and live trading is likely to be.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 20, 2009
216 โพสต์
Jun 21, 2010 at 18:00
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 20, 2009
216 โพสต์
Problem with backtesting is that you had historical events taking place, like Hungary, German short suspension etc. History never ever repeats itself, but there is repeating patterns. A trader takes historical events into consideration as he trades. My best trading is done when there is no news, no downgrades , no surprises, just the normal ebb and flow of the market.
*การใช้งานเชิงพาณิชย์และสแปมจะไม่ได้รับการยอมรับ และอาจส่งผลให้บัญชีถูกยกเลิก
เคล็ดลับ: การโพสต์รูปภาพ/youtube url จะฝังลงในโพสต์ของคุณโดยอัตโนมัติ!
เคล็ดลับ: พิมพ์เครื่องหมาย @ เพื่อป้อนชื่อผู้ใช้ที่เข้าร่วมการสนทนานี้โดยอัตโนมัติ