walker36 "의 게시물 - 페이지 46

"Just Oil" 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 11, 2011 at 09:37

WTG😉

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 11, 2011 at 09:12

Ok guys I assume that you have solve the puzzle.so the equation changes from:profit = entry_gap + exit_gap - slippageto:profit = entry_gap + exit_gap + slippage_favor - slippage_against%50 of slippage problem turn our favor.this needs a quite complicated code but it will give more then spent😉

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 10, 2011 at 22:46

Chikot not you😉

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 10, 2011 at 22:44

NOW I AM MAKING A CALL TO ALL TRADERS THAT WERE MAKING COMMENT ON MINUS SLIPPAGE AND THIS SYSTEM WONT WORK ON LIVE ACCOUNT DUE TO THAT ISSUE.MINUS SLIPPAGE IS WORKING TO MY FAVOR.SOLVE THE PUZZLE!!!😎

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 10, 2011 at 22:36

I was born in a bottle of Rakı. ( very similar with Greece Uzo )I am quite well drinker. ok better then quite.😀I have started with Beer then vodka ages ago😁 currently Rakı and whiskey.yes we have good places for holiday at south, mediterenian side.

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 10, 2011 at 22:25

guys and gals,this called LEARNING BY DOING.the most expensive way of LEARNING or most innocent way of loosing MONEY.calculations codes are all correct.LOGIC is missing the poınt.I have never thought that MINUS(-) Slippage will work for my favor.But it is. thats why my calculations are different then the P/L calculation.Think about it 😉

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 10, 2011 at 22:19

currently number 1 Tennis player. novak djokovicsorry for spelling. No I am from Turkey. letter ç = ch in english nick name steve walker is inspired from johnnie walker whisky label36 attached by yahoo email.<a href='http://www.myfxbook.com/files/walker36/08a7c18212fce6cadfc134be2610071b_1280152540.jpg' target='_blank'><img src='http://www.myfxbook.com/files/walker36/08a7c18212fce6cadfc134be2610071b_1280152540.jpg'/></a>I like that walking character. and I like whisky too.

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 10, 2011 at 22:00

well last bets!!!nadal vs murrayI bet on nadal. >I dont like him but want to see on final with Cokoviç😇

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 10, 2011 at 21:58

I have checked both scripts and dll. could not find any wrong code. this error is random. so I really thinking of same problem what I have seen on pepper that happen on other brokers. for those tests I had dısabled ask line due spread has nothing to do with arb trades but I guess I should keep it enabled from now to see if it is my fault or broker trick.I am still %75 betting on my wrong code but...

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 10, 2011 at 21:48

yes I have noticed that at pepperstone. it was catching my eye but never focused on for long time. then one day when making some EA tests I have seen a difference prices between EA and order execution. so I did investigate. and found out that spread seen on market watch is different then spread I see on the chart. made some tests on demo and live and see same thing on both. I had take a screen capture of pending order execution which was triggered before market watch has reached that price. Long pending order triggered with the ask line seen on the chart not with the real price. I have send th...

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 10, 2011 at 21:10

guys are you watching US Open semifinal Federe cokoviç ( very difficoult to spell )my favorite is cokoviç 😁

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 10, 2011 at 21:02

they have defend mechanism against all traders. thats for sure and thats I understand due they are dealing with hundred of thousands in miliseconds. but currently those defend mechanısm is working for making money for them not for protecting. I have posted info about FXCM and I have just posted the issue about pepper. most of the traders have no clue about what s going on behind the charts. they believe what they see on the screen.I wonder if any other pepperstone client has seen that problem I have mentioned. so this is becoming a war between clients and brokers. what they do is locking thing...

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 10, 2011 at 20:35

Chikot,current set up for the arbitrage isentry_gap +1,50 pipexit_gap +1,50 pip+ spreadspread is neutralized in the logic of arbitrage trade.equation isLONG entrybroker_1_ask<=broker_2_bid - entry_gapLONG exitbroker_1_bid>=broker_2_as + exit_gapso spread is neutrally out of calculation of P/L.so total profit is entry_gap + exit_gap = 3,00 pip currentlythat gap can be setted to a bigger value but then- bigger the gap bigger the slippage- order execution frequency is lowerand this is not good for me to collect enough data for work. ( if I can collect them correctly. 🙄 )so on eve...

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 10, 2011 at 19:02

calculated slippage recorded slippagepepper vs atc -2,62 -4,10 gallant vs primus -2,09 -3,40 primus vs active -0,58 -2,49PS slippage value is including 4 trades taken for 1 arbirtage attaemp. PSS yes I do consider the commision values and those are out of P/L calculation to find the corrrect slippae😳😕🙄😞🙃😭😲😡

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 10, 2011 at 18:38

guys we have problem here.recorded average slippage value is much more higher when compared to the P/L value at brokers history data.on one hand this is good to hear that the slippage is lower then I recorded but on the other hand there is record error.and this error is random. it will be difficoult to find where the problem is.I was ecpecting that on pepperstone due pepperston data feed has a problem. this is what their support says.internal data feed and order execution records are different. basicly when you see spread on secreen as 0.5 pip in reality it is more then 1.0 pip. but on the oth...

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 10, 2011 at 18:19

Chikot😉

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 10, 2011 at 08:17

I have worked on 2500 lines of last week data last night until now.this week I have runpepper vs atc at au vpsgallant vs fxprimus at localfxprimus vs active at vps us publishing on my portfoliobroker characteristics are opposite.eg..if you call atc and active as nothpepper and fxpriimus and gallant are southregarding the slippage issue.ATSmartTrader what I mentıoned from learn issue was each instances has record data into dll and those data will be used to create common/separate setup that change with every order executıon.you can imagine this like windows start button. it learns users activit...

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 09, 2011 at 22:02

guys and gals,I am at the point of desecion while ımproving the algo.here are the options- both brokers setup will be same / easiest- each broker setup will seperate- dll will learn each brokers reaction/respond and resetup itself according to collected data / most complicatedhmmmmmmmmm.......................

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 09, 2011 at 18:37

I have an idea to boost the profit but this will cancel the HEDGE opportunity on that boost trades. this can also be added as an option to the system.

watch this video. can be interesting 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Sep 09, 2011 at 18:20

thank you for input.brokers having DD accounts, check their price feed against "arb" trading. and they usually use their STP price feed to compare.currently sytem working on STP vs STP ( ECN vs ECN ) accounts. the main problem with those is slıppage. so I am currently working on that and had progress.😉.walker

EURUSD	1.08669	GBPUSD	1.30446	AUDUSD	0.67028
USDJPY	149.464	USDCAD	1.38086	USDCHF	0.8647

forex_trader_36599 에 의한 게시물