Volatility Factor - Alpari Real
사용자가 이 시스템을 삭제했습니다.
Edit Your Comment
Volatility Factor - Alpari Real 토론
Aug 16, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물453
Apr 25, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물262
Mar 28, 2012 at 10:09
(편집됨 Mar 28, 2012 at 10:10)
Apr 25, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물262
mistificator posted:
looks cool
The growth curve looks cool, indeed, but to me the EA suddenly looks totally not cool. Reason? Too much averaging down. See here a basket that went all the way to 8 trades:
02.16.2012 17:01 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57124 1.57554 -43.0 -25.58 5d -0.49%
02.16.2012 17:25 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57285 1.57552 -26.7 -16.29 5d -0.31%
02.16.2012 17:28 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57462 1.57552 -9.0 -6.20 5d -0.12%
02.16.2012 17:36 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57657 1.57545 11.2 5.32 5d 0.10%
02.16.2012 23:47 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57994 1.57543 45.1 24.64 5d 0.47%
02.17.2012 11:13 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.58173 1.57535 63.8 35.57 5d 0.69%
02.17.2012 11:36 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.58473 1.57526 94.7 53.18 4d 1.04%
02.20.2012 00:17 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.58615 1.57522 109.3 61.81 2d 1.22%
Mar 29, 2012 at 10:32
May 24, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물371
Experienced people know that the grid system should be tested at least 10 years of backtest. This EA has backtets only from 26/08/2008!!! I think that backtest from 2007 will account blow up. Very similar to one EA, which is free. I wonder if that you guess?
https://www.volatility-factor.com/backtests/gbpusd_0,1_lot.htm
https://www.volatility-factor.com/backtests/gbpusd_0,1_lot.htm
Jul 27, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물3
forex_trader_55397
Dec 02, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물51
Mar 29, 2012 at 14:33
Dec 02, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물51
maxoverkill posted:
WSFR is crap? Really? And why is that? Please do tell.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/jd5503/wsfr/120393
Jul 27, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물3
Jul 27, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물3
Mar 30, 2012 at 13:04
Jul 27, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물3
Meta4r3x posted:
nasty? u ain't see nothing yet...here, lol 😝😝😝
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/jd5503/wsfr2/123116
He traded unsupported pairs and he played with SL. Look at his worst trade, -1323 pips. He probably used suicide mode ;)
Mar 27, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물33
forex_trader_32776
Mar 28, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1008
Apr 01, 2012 at 12:07
Mar 28, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1008
NextLevelForex posted:
mistificator posted:
looks cool
The growth curve looks cool, indeed, but to me the EA suddenly looks totally not cool. Reason? Too much averaging down. See here a basket that went all the way to 8 trades:
02.16.2012 17:01 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57124 1.57554 -43.0 -25.58 5d -0.49%
02.16.2012 17:25 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57285 1.57552 -26.7 -16.29 5d -0.31%
02.16.2012 17:28 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57462 1.57552 -9.0 -6.20 5d -0.12%
02.16.2012 17:36 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57657 1.57545 11.2 5.32 5d 0.10%
02.16.2012 23:47 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.57994 1.57543 45.1 24.64 5d 0.47%
02.17.2012 11:13 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.58173 1.57535 63.8 35.57 5d 0.69%
02.17.2012 11:36 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.58473 1.57526 94.7 53.18 4d 1.04%
02.20.2012 00:17 02.22.2012 11:31 GBPUSD Sell 0.10 - - 1.58615 1.57522 109.3 61.81 2d 1.22%
Remus found 8 open positions. Birt's EA Review website stated 4 positions max. Can the developer please share the details of what this strategy does.
I also noticed the recent losses, Does the EA close the positions before the weekend? Is that the reason for closing down the latest positions and not stacking more to the floating loss
Apr 25, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물262
Apr 05, 2012 at 16:03
Apr 25, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물262
The max basket size is one of the EA parameters (to be precise, the parameter actually tells how many positions to open when averaging down, so it would be 7 or 3 in our case). I bet the recent close of the EURUSD basket and the fact that there are no new GPBUSD positions opened in the current basket is because they changed the basket size for this official account, from 8 to 4.
Apr 06, 2012 at 08:26
Nov 04, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물4
The default 'maxnegs' is 3, so it will add the original position, plus 3 more, by default. You can set this as high as you want, but in their backtests they show that 3 is the best option for least drawdown and max profitability factor. That being said, I have personally set mine to 1, so it will do initial position + 1. You can even set it to 0 if you want.
Apr 16, 2012 at 06:37
Mar 11, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물14
Meta4r3x posted:
nasty? u ain't see nothing yet...here, lol 😝😝😝
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/jd5503/wsfr2/123116
you are not serious when you show that as a proof to denigrate wfr?
what i like is to see bt before 2008,for me this is the the biggest turn off about that ea. only ignorant or stupid people will buy this without any more proofs
Mar 19, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물2
Apr 16, 2012 at 07:43
Mar 19, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물2
Meta4r3x posted:
piece of carp just like WSFR...
you have to know what change in WSFR to be good enough for you.
If you make many back tests you will find the answer.
WS is good if you want to have stable 5% monthly, and I am telling you, it is enough :-)
best regardst
Thomas
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.