Forex Combo System EURUSD (에 의해 birt)
| : 게인 | +29.24% |
| 드로다운 | 31.82% |
| 핍스: | 1756.0 |
| 거래 | 1319 |
| 원 : |
|
| 손실: |
|
| : 종류 | 리얼 |
| 레버리지: | 1:500 |
| 거래 : | 자동화 |
Forex Combo System EURUSD 토론
Mar 14, 2012 at 09:04
(편집됨 Mar 14, 2012 at 09:09)
birt posted:
fxsuper posted:
I think is the same problem of Fx Thor and MDP
Yes, most likely.
I got Thor and also the demo of NO... So I could perform some backtests and realize that they trade the same time, more or less...
Entries and exit differ from a few seconds/minutes and FXThor takes 60% of the NO's trades...
So now there are 2 more EAs that trade the same events as MDP... 3 ? Oh... there is one more, BDP... But I m not sure Morpheus did much more than adding his own logo on MDP (outrageous... even the notice of the EA is copied from MDP lol)...
Anyway, the competition for servers will be hard in the coming months while price will spike out of its Bollinger...
Mar 14, 2012 at 09:20
(편집됨 Mar 14, 2012 at 09:22)
You forgot NMI Scalper.... 😉
In my opinion these impulsive scalpers will be good only on paper trading because they trade in most volatility period when any broker protect itself with 'unconventional methods'....Especially if these robots become very popular.
In my opinion these impulsive scalpers will be good only on paper trading because they trade in most volatility period when any broker protect itself with 'unconventional methods'....Especially if these robots become very popular.
No PAIN= No GAIN!!!
Mar 14, 2012 at 09:38
fxsuper posted:
You forgot NMI Scalper.... 😉
In my opinion these impulsive scalpers will be good only on paper trading because they trade in most volatility period when any broker protect itself with 'unconventional methods'....Especially if these robots become very popular.
Completely agree. Currently it's very, very hard to find a setup that works for MDP and I imagine the same goes for the others.
Apr 02, 2012 at 12:20
itasterix posted:
The drawdown from the 1/1/2012 was really out of maximum expected.
I think this expert need to be optimized again.
What do U tink about ?
I was extremely surprised to see such a large drawdown after its very good performance during some 1.5 years of live forward testing. When it was around 20%, I figured it was still within the max historical drawdown and was kind of expecting it to turn back around, but that didn't happen. I'm at a loss when it comes to a logical explanation for it. I have no clue what it could be that lead to such an extreme turn in its behavior, but I completely agree with you - it needs some attention from the author... Not sure if it has to be optimized or what but it surely seems that at this point the whole ensemble of strategies is just not profitable anymore.
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.
