Aggressive (에 의해 forex_trader_447532)
사용자가 이 시스템을 삭제했습니다.
Edit Your Comment
Aggressive 토론
May 02, 2020 부터 멤버
게시물1
Oct 30, 2020 부터 멤버
게시물4
![](/userimages.jpg?uid=447532&id=908805&w=100&h=100)
forex_trader_447532
Jul 27, 2017 부터 멤버
게시물14
Jan 02, 2021 at 21:24
Jul 27, 2017 부터 멤버
게시물14
hey everyone, a pleasure to have you here
this result of manual trading for a couple of days, it's not consistent if systemically done over a longer period, and what good a profit is if we cannot keep it grow ..
so I advise you to take a look at my profile and disregard all the systems before Meta Level sys everything before Meta level is below meta level in term of not only profit but consistency which is more important, I advise you look at meta level losses, not profits, cuz a good prediction of how a system will perform in the future comes from analyzing how it manages the losing trades not how much profits it's making right now or will make in the future , although you would see eventually that good management of losses directly reflect great profits over time, it's not about if it can lose trades or cant "profit-trade in %" cuz it will lose and every real systematic operation will lose some trades no matter how good is it, Meta level not only have an edge over the market and high-profit trade in %, it uses order types at price and time that systematically advantages from market structure to avoid market crises and abnormal slippages, in fact, we exploit those to the maximum to our advantages when they occur,
in conclusion, Meta level EA is actually the meta level of automated algorithms that can manage money on a small/medium scale.
FYI Meta level strategy is an upgrade of Executioner EA strategy so it can cover the huge cost of scalp trading real servers of brokers and by the cost, i mean real market price slippage + floating spread + fixed entry commission per lot
profile link : https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Casper9sep
hope this adds some value to your beautiful minds
Regards
this result of manual trading for a couple of days, it's not consistent if systemically done over a longer period, and what good a profit is if we cannot keep it grow ..
so I advise you to take a look at my profile and disregard all the systems before Meta Level sys everything before Meta level is below meta level in term of not only profit but consistency which is more important, I advise you look at meta level losses, not profits, cuz a good prediction of how a system will perform in the future comes from analyzing how it manages the losing trades not how much profits it's making right now or will make in the future , although you would see eventually that good management of losses directly reflect great profits over time, it's not about if it can lose trades or cant "profit-trade in %" cuz it will lose and every real systematic operation will lose some trades no matter how good is it, Meta level not only have an edge over the market and high-profit trade in %, it uses order types at price and time that systematically advantages from market structure to avoid market crises and abnormal slippages, in fact, we exploit those to the maximum to our advantages when they occur,
in conclusion, Meta level EA is actually the meta level of automated algorithms that can manage money on a small/medium scale.
FYI Meta level strategy is an upgrade of Executioner EA strategy so it can cover the huge cost of scalp trading real servers of brokers and by the cost, i mean real market price slippage + floating spread + fixed entry commission per lot
profile link : https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Casper9sep
hope this adds some value to your beautiful minds
Regards
![](/statistics/utv.jpg?id=1505512&r=0.7154021911517897)
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.