591801 (에 의해 forex_trader_8864)
사용자가 이 시스템을 삭제했습니다.
Edit Your Comment
591801 토론
forex_trader_8864
Mar 18, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물127
Aug 02, 2010 at 05:25
(편집됨 Aug 02, 2010 at 05:31)
Nov 02, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물94
Did you forward test before it .. ?
i use to use martingale before, it also busted my account, now i tried grid trading , it seem profit since last month
firt depo 100$ busted ..!
seconds depo 100$ busted
Last Depo 40$
Here the result .. !
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Touareg/mkmk-3/41307
i use to use martingale before, it also busted my account, now i tried grid trading , it seem profit since last month
firt depo 100$ busted ..!
seconds depo 100$ busted
Last Depo 40$
Here the result .. !
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Touareg/mkmk-3/41307
Try not to be greedy trading with no emotion
forex_trader_8864
Mar 18, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물127
Aug 02, 2010 at 06:20
Mar 18, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물127
this will be the forward test on blessing 3.
5k depo, usdjpy only and used the last setfile from thier website.
5k depo, usdjpy only and used the last setfile from thier website.
Touareg posted:
Did you forward test before it .. ?
i use to use martingale before, it also busted my account, now i tried grid trading , it seem profit since last month
firt depo 100$ busted ..!
seconds depo 100$ busted
Last Depo 40$
Here the result .. !
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Touareg/mkmk-3/41307
Jul 18, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물26
Apr 20, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물814
Aug 02, 2010 at 08:45
(편집됨 Aug 02, 2010 at 08:46)
Apr 20, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물814
You no upload your demo testing of Bless 3?
Here my sample for you : https://www.myfxbook.com/members/ForexSeeker/5-bless-martin/29610
3 month tested of FXDD, look like the UsdJpy only make -$33.88 in 3 month.
So your account is hardly to blow in 3 month, please try with all 5 pairs, change to get blow is better.
Erhhmmm... 22 pairs better, here the example https://www.myfxbook.com/members/bluemele/blessings-v3-7-6/38075
But that is IBXF micro , so you probably just need 10 pairs to get job done.
Here my sample for you : https://www.myfxbook.com/members/ForexSeeker/5-bless-martin/29610
3 month tested of FXDD, look like the UsdJpy only make -$33.88 in 3 month.
So your account is hardly to blow in 3 month, please try with all 5 pairs, change to get blow is better.
Erhhmmm... 22 pairs better, here the example https://www.myfxbook.com/members/bluemele/blessings-v3-7-6/38075
But that is IBXF micro , so you probably just need 10 pairs to get job done.
Information is Gold when come to organised.
forex_trader_8864
Mar 18, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물127
Aug 02, 2010 at 09:12
(편집됨 Aug 02, 2010 at 09:14)
Mar 18, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물127
ForexSeeker posted:
You no upload your demo testing of Bless 3?
i deleted all my demo account as im now testing EA's on LIVE accounts only
ForexSeeker posted: Here my sample for you : https://www.myfxbook.com/members/ForexSeeker/5-bless-martin/29610
3 month tested of FXDD, look like the UsdJpy only make -$33.88 in 3 month.
So your account is hardly to blow in 3 month, please try with all 5 pairs, change to get blow is better.
Erhhmmm... 22 pairs better, here the example https://www.myfxbook.com/members/bluemele/blessings-v3-7-6/38075
But that is IBXF micro , so you probably just need 10 pairs to get job done.
thanks but no thanks for your suggestion, im not in a hurry to blow up 5k. 😝😄
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Aug 02, 2010 at 09:18
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Demo testing only goes so far. It tells you if the logic of the system works. It isn't until you put a system on to a live account that you get a real result. I've seen demo systems that survived the exact same period that a live account blew up in as demo accounts don't have to worry about petty little problems like liquidity.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
forex_trader_8864
Mar 18, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물127
Aug 02, 2010 at 09:21
Mar 18, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물127
precisely. 😀
stevetrade posted:
Demo testing only goes so far. It tells you if the logic of the system works. It isn't until you put a system on to a live account that you get a real result. I've seen demo systems that survived the exact same period that a live account blew up in as demo accounts don't have to worry about petty little problems like liquidity.
Apr 20, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물814
Aug 02, 2010 at 09:34
(편집됨 Aug 02, 2010 at 09:37)
Apr 20, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물814
What mean by liquidity ? You mean that the big move of pip in market where spread suddenly go high and you get re-quote as the market price change too fast ?
Can it be a problem to the trade if it already have pending order , stop loss, take profit ?
Like Bless3 already putting this pre-order in the broker server, will it facing re-quote problem and not able to execute the Sop Loss and loss more than he suppose to ?? Ohhh.. Bless3 no have stop loss, using EA internal control. Will be pending order not able to execute on server on liquidity period ?
Can it be a problem to the trade if it already have pending order , stop loss, take profit ?
Like Bless3 already putting this pre-order in the broker server, will it facing re-quote problem and not able to execute the Sop Loss and loss more than he suppose to ?? Ohhh.. Bless3 no have stop loss, using EA internal control. Will be pending order not able to execute on server on liquidity period ?
Information is Gold when come to organised.
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Aug 02, 2010 at 09:41
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
I didn't even get on to rapid movements in the market where you don't get filled at the price you wanted or don't get filled full stop - which is also a good killer of Martingale systems - so thanks for bringing those up 😄
Liquidity, spread and what I like to call pip velocity can all have an impact on any aspect of a trade, whether your order gets filled and at what price.
Liquidity, spread and what I like to call pip velocity can all have an impact on any aspect of a trade, whether your order gets filled and at what price.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Apr 20, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물814
Aug 02, 2010 at 10:13
Apr 20, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물814
Liquidity maybe a problem to manual trader, where he unable place the trade or getting the common error or re-quote when busy times.
But pending order, stop loss, take profit which already store in borker site is 100% will be execute rite?
Any trader facing problem where the pending order, SL, TP is not working even recorder in the broker server?
So effect to Martingale EA will be he miss the trade and only open trade when the price is far up, which not able to comply any more with it martingale strategy.
The effect will be more on tight scalping EA such like my 'Kill Bill 5' EA, where EA will not able to modify the TP and hit SL.
Is more obvious on FapTurbo where he got bunch of filters on spread,slip page, height, times to avoid liquidity.
So far my experience on Martingale that vulnerable to liquidity is that it use instant execution rather then pending order with SL and TP.
And my 'Kill Bill 5' make crazy 418% on Alpari because of the crazy big move up and down of price on 6May till 10May.
So you can get lucky with liquidity using EA but not with manual trade.
But pending order, stop loss, take profit which already store in borker site is 100% will be execute rite?
Any trader facing problem where the pending order, SL, TP is not working even recorder in the broker server?
So effect to Martingale EA will be he miss the trade and only open trade when the price is far up, which not able to comply any more with it martingale strategy.
The effect will be more on tight scalping EA such like my 'Kill Bill 5' EA, where EA will not able to modify the TP and hit SL.
Is more obvious on FapTurbo where he got bunch of filters on spread,slip page, height, times to avoid liquidity.
So far my experience on Martingale that vulnerable to liquidity is that it use instant execution rather then pending order with SL and TP.
And my 'Kill Bill 5' make crazy 418% on Alpari because of the crazy big move up and down of price on 6May till 10May.
So you can get lucky with liquidity using EA but not with manual trade.
Information is Gold when come to organised.
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Aug 02, 2010 at 10:18
(편집됨 Aug 02, 2010 at 10:18)
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Nothing in live trading is 100% reliable. Manual trading is more reliable as you are there to keep mashing the buttons and I'm sure the cursing and swearing helps but in my experience EA's will always fail to carry out their duly appointed task at some point.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Apr 20, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물814
Aug 02, 2010 at 10:26
(편집됨 Aug 02, 2010 at 10:27)
Apr 20, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물814
Do you have shortcut button EA for manual trade ? As most time I try to place a trade, it already out of my range when I press F9 and try to key in SL and TP.
So how you able to keep smashing your keyboard in times of execution fails and price keep jumping around ?
Or you have a special add in interface program to control your MT4 interface for pre-setting of TP and SL using a single touch ?
So how you able to keep smashing your keyboard in times of execution fails and price keep jumping around ?
Or you have a special add in interface program to control your MT4 interface for pre-setting of TP and SL using a single touch ?
Information is Gold when come to organised.
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Aug 02, 2010 at 10:31
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
I don't manual trade on MT4. If I do manual trade, I trade on Dukascopy.
I use MT4 only for EA trading and bridging trades across to Dukascopy.
However I believe - I'm sure one of the manual traders will help out here - that if the broker can't fulfill your order then they put you back to the order entry box and you can modify if required and resubmit.
I have on occasion manually traded on MT4 and when I did I tend to use an EA that manages my orders. i.e. adds in stop losses, targets and handles the trailing stops.
I also have an EA I wrote that allows trades, stop losses and take profits to be generated by drawing trend lines and horizontal lines on the charts. Much easier.
I use MT4 only for EA trading and bridging trades across to Dukascopy.
However I believe - I'm sure one of the manual traders will help out here - that if the broker can't fulfill your order then they put you back to the order entry box and you can modify if required and resubmit.
I have on occasion manually traded on MT4 and when I did I tend to use an EA that manages my orders. i.e. adds in stop losses, targets and handles the trailing stops.
I also have an EA I wrote that allows trades, stop losses and take profits to be generated by drawing trend lines and horizontal lines on the charts. Much easier.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.