Pulsator - EUR/USD 10 years (에 의해 numa)
The user has deleted this strategy.
Edit Your Comment
Pulsator - EUR/USD 10 years 토론
May 15, 2011 at 20:24
Feb 23, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물16
Hi, yes I would be happy to share my EA.
However, before I give a version to anybody, I'll test it rigorously over a couple of months in a real forward test.
Anybody who wants a free version simply let me know here and I'll contact you as soon as my forward test on a real account had run a couple of months successfully.
However, before I give a version to anybody, I'll test it rigorously over a couple of months in a real forward test.
Anybody who wants a free version simply let me know here and I'll contact you as soon as my forward test on a real account had run a couple of months successfully.
Dec 20, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물2
May 18, 2011 at 14:29
May 16, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물8
Hi, can someone let me know how to analyze/using the EA test result in this system tool? I had created the demo and real profile and successfully published but I don't know how to do the same for strategy tester result..😐
The Risk keep me trading...The Pips keep me coming....The Profit keep me going...
May 22, 2011 at 12:18
Feb 23, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물16
Hi,
no this is not a scalper strategy. Personally I don't think scalping can be successfull on the long run since it's your brokers money which you earn ;-)
My strategy here is based on detecting repeating oszillations and and an impuls that breaks out in one or the other direction is used as basis for a signal.
Regards
no this is not a scalper strategy. Personally I don't think scalping can be successfull on the long run since it's your brokers money which you earn ;-)
My strategy here is based on detecting repeating oszillations and and an impuls that breaks out in one or the other direction is used as basis for a signal.
Regards
May 23, 2011 at 22:50
Feb 19, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물2
Hello numa,
I think that the fundamental risk is much higher when the trade is more than one day open. I saw in your tradehistory that your stategie held some trade open for a long time. Do you calculate your stop loss dynamicaly ? How about your TP-Strategie.
I produced some EA's with different functionality. Some scalper and some trendsystems. Each system has his own Character.
Tell me more about your Close-Strategie.
Regards
HPHanke
I think that the fundamental risk is much higher when the trade is more than one day open. I saw in your tradehistory that your stategie held some trade open for a long time. Do you calculate your stop loss dynamicaly ? How about your TP-Strategie.
I produced some EA's with different functionality. Some scalper and some trendsystems. Each system has his own Character.
Tell me more about your Close-Strategie.
Regards
HPHanke
May 27, 2011 at 23:51
Feb 23, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물16
HI HPHanke,
well, the average duration time is between 0.5 and 2 days. Since the EA is trading on the 15 minutes time scale this is a a reasonable duration. Long open trades are rare as one of the goals was to i) minimize the number of open trades at all and ii) to minimize the open time. Exceptions are made however if the trades are within the winning zone even if a trailing s/l may be hit. In these cases, the longer open time only shows the length of the trend that was successfully recognized. You could easily verify my statement regarding the maximum drawback of only 6%.
Regards
Numa
well, the average duration time is between 0.5 and 2 days. Since the EA is trading on the 15 minutes time scale this is a a reasonable duration. Long open trades are rare as one of the goals was to i) minimize the number of open trades at all and ii) to minimize the open time. Exceptions are made however if the trades are within the winning zone even if a trailing s/l may be hit. In these cases, the longer open time only shows the length of the trend that was successfully recognized. You could easily verify my statement regarding the maximum drawback of only 6%.
Regards
Numa
May 24, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물7
May 29, 2011 at 20:01
(편집됨 May 29, 2011 at 20:12)
Feb 23, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물16
Hi A7_MaD,
thank you for your feedback.
A 'model quality of 0.0%' simply indicates that *no* modeling and optimization was performed.
MetaTrader allows to optimize your input parameters during a backtest and terms this brute-force search for best parameters 'modeling'. However, the problem is the following: If your EA is highly depending on input parameters it is very likely that it is well fitted for the past, but will likely fail in the future if trends/markets change. Therefore, my goal was to build an EA which is as parameter-invariant as possible. In addition, I did not performed any optimization (which is not possible for 10 years anyways without super-computer power). The result is an EA which is *not* the best with regard to maximum win, but shows on average a stable positive result and a low risk profile.
thank you for your feedback.
A 'model quality of 0.0%' simply indicates that *no* modeling and optimization was performed.
MetaTrader allows to optimize your input parameters during a backtest and terms this brute-force search for best parameters 'modeling'. However, the problem is the following: If your EA is highly depending on input parameters it is very likely that it is well fitted for the past, but will likely fail in the future if trends/markets change. Therefore, my goal was to build an EA which is as parameter-invariant as possible. In addition, I did not performed any optimization (which is not possible for 10 years anyways without super-computer power). The result is an EA which is *not* the best with regard to maximum win, but shows on average a stable positive result and a low risk profile.
forex_trader_38776
Jun 10, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물26
Jun 10, 2011 at 13:13
Jun 10, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물26
I wish to test your EA. Pls contact my email '[email protected]'. thks.
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.