MT4 EA - MyForexDaily by AlceNet (에 의해 forex_trader_79110)
The user has deleted this strategy.
MT4 EA - MyForexDaily by AlceNet 토론
forex_trader_79110
May 30, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물26
Oct 20, 2012 at 18:39
Video of the EA in action!!
forex_trader_79110
May 30, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물26
Oct 20, 2012 at 18:41
https://livestre.am/4bAfh this is the video
forex_trader_79110
May 30, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물26
Oct 20, 2012 at 18:41
link to youtube
forex_trader_79110
May 30, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물26
Oct 23, 2012 at 19:54
haha for comment this dont waste the time xd
Oct 19, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물3
Oct 25, 2012 at 04:15
Good night:
Does this robot is for sale?
greetings
Does this robot is for sale?
greetings
Oct 19, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물3
Oct 25, 2012 at 12:54
Buenos días:
La verdad con un 10% mensual me sería suficiente, puedes explicarme un poco los detalles, en que se basa, un broker ECN sería bueno o mejor uno con spread fijos, el grafico de rentabilidad que enseñas es en demo o en real, si puedes mandame todo lo que puedas en un privado (solo informacion util para despejar mis dudas, mi intencion no es copiarle ni nada parecido) y hablamos de a compra
Un saludo
La verdad con un 10% mensual me sería suficiente, puedes explicarme un poco los detalles, en que se basa, un broker ECN sería bueno o mejor uno con spread fijos, el grafico de rentabilidad que enseñas es en demo o en real, si puedes mandame todo lo que puedas en un privado (solo informacion util para despejar mis dudas, mi intencion no es copiarle ni nada parecido) y hablamos de a compra
Un saludo
forex_trader_43716
Aug 06, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물345
Nov 22, 2012 at 21:25
How come you are not displaying forward test results? Despite risking 20% of account funds and trading huge lot sizes, your drawdown looks realistic. Nice going, but those forward test results need to be published.
forex_trader_79110
May 30, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물26
Dec 09, 2012 at 22:04
Im not sell my system and my experience, sorry.
Aug 31, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물34
Jan 15, 2013 at 08:21
how you get this here:
Model Quality: 0.0% - awesome :D
Model Quality: 0.0% - awesome :D
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Jan 17, 2013 at 11:22
Model quality 0.0% means that the backtest is basically junk.
My guess is it's using pip based charts or similar? I've got an EA that gives similar results with 0.0% model quality. Absolutely bombed in live trading.
Best regards Steve
My guess is it's using pip based charts or similar? I've got an EA that gives similar results with 0.0% model quality. Absolutely bombed in live trading.
Best regards Steve
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
forex_trader_79110
May 30, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물26
Jan 17, 2013 at 11:27
(편집됨 Jan 17, 2013 at 11:37)
That daring is ignorance. You should inform before speaking.
I will not give information, is visible from afar that learning does not interest you. But the quality model interprets the history normal candles. And now there are three systems that break that rule and do trading (renko, range and my system). The model quality is always 0.
I will not give information, is visible from afar that learning does not interest you. But the quality model interprets the history normal candles. And now there are three systems that break that rule and do trading (renko, range and my system). The model quality is always 0.
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Jan 17, 2013 at 11:45
I'm not sure that phrase translated too well into English.
'That ignorance is bold' might be better.
I gave a statement based on my own experience in answer to a question asked - as you yourself had already stated you were not sharing your experience.
Then I asked a question, which is generally the route to solving ignorance. If you don't wish to answer it I'm fine with that. However something will always turn up to fill a vacuum.
'That ignorance is bold' might be better.
I gave a statement based on my own experience in answer to a question asked - as you yourself had already stated you were not sharing your experience.
Then I asked a question, which is generally the route to solving ignorance. If you don't wish to answer it I'm fine with that. However something will always turn up to fill a vacuum.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
forex_trader_79110
May 30, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물26
Jan 17, 2013 at 11:58
No problem. I have not expressed well. The reviews are good, and so is answer questions. Now we're all informed. Continue to work hard and reach high, that's the secret.
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Jan 17, 2013 at 12:03
Hmm, I'd still like to know why your model quality is 0.0% and given that why you feel you can trust the system?
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
forex_trader_79110
May 30, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물26
Jan 17, 2013 at 12:30
The 'model quality' high load, low opening and closing at different timeframes to pass the EA, and quality is lost when these are not available. For example with 'renko', if you generate an archive file and use it with Renko backtest (only renko history) this problem will happen with the 'model quality'. My system is based on boxes and bars range, I need to generate the hand history to pass for the backtest.
Currently since 2011 have made a profit in several live accounts, for me is enough. Nor sell or rent my system, I just want to teach people to continue fighting because they can also get interesting things.
Currently since 2011 have made a profit in several live accounts, for me is enough. Nor sell or rent my system, I just want to teach people to continue fighting because they can also get interesting things.
