=EC2= (에 의해 Prasono)

: 게인 +98.3M%
드로다운 0.00%
핍스: 5152.8
거래 3559
원 :
손실:
모델 품질 : 90.0%
테스트 막대: 109790
: 모델링된 틱 21603117
전진 테스트를 사용할 수 없습니다.

=EC2= 토론

Jun 13, 2010 at 11:52
2,047 개의 뷰
8 Replies
Sep 09, 2009 부터 멤버   게시물71
Jun 13, 2010 at 13:01
hi,

which EA you using?
Slow and Steady Wins the Race :)
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버   게시물1430
Jun 13, 2010 at 16:58
Nice backtest, what are you risking per trade there?
Looks like about 15% on each trade. Is that right?
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Aug 30, 2009 부터 멤버   게시물9
Jun 13, 2010 at 17:42
U have Nice backtest also Steve, less Drawdown
Jun 14, 2010 부터 멤버   게시물1
Jun 14, 2010 at 23:17
Very nice backtest,have you try on a real account, Mr. Arief? I can talk in 'Bahasa' language.

I am very newbie in forex and ea-user at demo account. I hope i can learn from you all here.

You have very good ea, Mr. Arief. Absolutely.
Feb 06, 2010 부터 멤버   게시물24
Jun 16, 2010 at 07:00
You will never get the same results live, this back test strategy section should be scrapped as I know for a fact when back testing with Alpari you are getting the spread of a Pro Account for running tests, can't open low deposits accounts on a Pro Account!😲

Suspect all brokers provide better data to use for back tests lulling us in to false sense of security without us knowing what settings are used for the back test
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버   게시물1430
Jun 16, 2010 at 07:22
I think most people are aware that backtesting is flawed. There are certain things people can do to get around this. One of which is to obtain better tick data.

I think backtesting is a valid exercise and I have one rule. If it blows up in backtesting it's in the bin. If it passes backtesting then there is half a chance it might work live.

Also the smaller the pip values your EA is dealing with and the shorter the timeframe the higher the discrepancy between the backtest and live trading is likely to be.

11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Aug 20, 2009 부터 멤버   게시물216
Jun 21, 2010 at 18:00
Problem with backtesting is that you had historical events taking place, like Hungary, German short suspension etc. History never ever repeats itself, but there is repeating patterns. A trader takes historical events into consideration as he trades. My best trading is done when there is no news, no downgrades , no surprises, just the normal ebb and flow of the market.
Aug 15, 2010 부터 멤버   게시물9
Oct 03, 2010 at 06:04
What's the Ea?
Jan 29, 2011 부터 멤버   게시물4
Jan 29, 2011 at 16:01
he can you help me please.
로그인 / 가입하기 to comment
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.