Could somebody please lend me $150 (에 의해 stevetrade)
사용자는 자신의 전략을 비공개로 만들었습니다.
Could somebody please lend me $150 토론
Jun 26, 2010 at 09:27
2,097 개의 뷰
19 Replies
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Jun 26, 2010 at 09:33
I wouldn't run this on a live account, I wouldn't know what to do with all the money.
Seriously. This was run with an overly aggressive 7% risk, in fact at the start it was possibly even higher than that.
It was also ran on weekend spreads ( about 5 pips on EurJpy ), which just goes to show the strength of the underlying trading algorithym.
It uses different settings of the alpha build of Behemoth and the trading frequency is also way too high. There is also a horrible period of drawdown in the middle somewhere, you can't see it on this chart.
Seriously. This was run with an overly aggressive 7% risk, in fact at the start it was possibly even higher than that.
It was also ran on weekend spreads ( about 5 pips on EurJpy ), which just goes to show the strength of the underlying trading algorithym.
It uses different settings of the alpha build of Behemoth and the trading frequency is also way too high. There is also a horrible period of drawdown in the middle somewhere, you can't see it on this chart.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
forex_trader_7
Aug 01, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물941
Jun 26, 2010 at 10:09
Run it on demo for a week or so and if it works I'll lend you $110 bucks...
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Jun 26, 2010 at 11:29
I've already put the 'official' settings on a small live account with minimum risk, even though the EA is still at alpha stage.
Thanks for the offer though Elkart, much appreciated!
Thanks for the offer though Elkart, much appreciated!
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
forex_trader_7
Aug 01, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물941
Jun 26, 2010 at 13:30
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Jun 26, 2010 at 16:58
Oh I'm easy, beer, wine, spirits.
I'm just going to clear up now, that I don't actually need to borrow $150. I wasn't canvassing for money ( although maybe I should now! ).
I was just making the point that the account started with only $150 and then got up to $80 billion in 10 or so years.
I've already put this EA ( even in it's alpha state ) on a live account. If it works as anticipated then I'll think about running managed accounts with it somewhere at some point in the future.
I'm just going to clear up now, that I don't actually need to borrow $150. I wasn't canvassing for money ( although maybe I should now! ).
I was just making the point that the account started with only $150 and then got up to $80 billion in 10 or so years.
I've already put this EA ( even in it's alpha state ) on a live account. If it works as anticipated then I'll think about running managed accounts with it somewhere at some point in the future.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Oct 22, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물33
Jun 26, 2010 at 17:36
how is this possible, going back to 1999 even with a demo, considering this isn't being uploaded as a backtest?
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Jun 26, 2010 at 22:17
eliteeservices posted:
how is this possible, going back to 1999 even with a demo, considering this isn't being uploaded as a backtest?
I'm sorry not sure I understand your question?
How is what possible?
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
forex_trader_7
Aug 01, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물941
Jun 27, 2010 at 07:43
(편집됨 Jun 27, 2010 at 07:44)
Rainer he already is, just click the link: https://www.tradency.com/EN/NewSystems.aspx
Cast iron man or something it's called.
Cast iron man or something it's called.
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Jun 27, 2010 at 10:04
Thanks for the mention Elkart.
Cast Iron Man is my daily breakout strategy. Currently not performing too well.
This is a new EA and I will only start managing with this once it has proved itself live.
Cast Iron Man is my daily breakout strategy. Currently not performing too well.
This is a new EA and I will only start managing with this once it has proved itself live.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Jun 29, 2010 at 18:14
Nope, every tick.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Jun 29, 2010 at 20:57
I'm using fixed range bars, it reports all the bars as mismatched chart errors and the calculation for modelling quality gets screwed up. As long as you ensure you download the history before every backtest to ensure you're using the up to date minute data it should be okay - or at least as good as a normal 90% backtest anyway.
As with all EA's though forward trading is the only way to prove the concept. It's looking good so far.
As with all EA's though forward trading is the only way to prove the concept. It's looking good so far.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Jun 29, 2010 at 22:07
I've decided to make my backtests private in order not to hog the entire strategies board. I will publish the backtests on my blog.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1430
Jul 23, 2010 at 06:32
Forward test is here
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/stevetrade/behemoth-conservative/39949
My blog is here
stevetrade.wordpress.com
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/stevetrade/behemoth-conservative/39949
My blog is here
stevetrade.wordpress.com
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.
