Steinitz Fractal Breakout (由 steinitz)
該使用者已經刪除了這個系統。
Edit Your Comment
Steinitz Fractal Breakout討論
會員從Jan 10, 2011開始
60帖子
會員從Feb 01, 2012開始
15帖子
Feb 03, 2012 at 13:15
會員從Oct 05, 2011開始
22帖子
Micheldutogo posted:
Not impressed since 1.00 lot/trade with multiple simultaneous trades for $10000 is called mismoneymanagement.
Not true. There is more then meets the eye then a blanket statement like yours. If I have a 90% win rate with a average pip win that is high enough you can trade 50% of your account. It all depends on win rate + margin available + average pip won + average standard deviation. If these numbers are inline you can trade 50% indefinately....
Feb 04, 2012 at 11:34
會員從Feb 01, 2012開始
1帖子
Glad to know its still the same fractal breakout indicator. I'm looking forward to learning the new way to trade it. Like i said, i only make a third of my capital every month using the combination stenitz fractal breakout indicator and the fractal divergence. I cherry pick the signal it produce, as much as possible, the signal must be very close to the 50MA. I guess i shouldn't be complaining about the result but i think it's always nice to strive for the better.
Feb 04, 2012 at 12:27
會員從Oct 05, 2011開始
22帖子
I'm glad to hear that you have perfected the fractal custom indicator. Good job on paying attention to the rules. Nothing wrong with what you're doing of course but I have drastically improved the method and will tutor serious people on a one-on-one basis to give you the new revisions. My session will last up to 2 hours and it's $500. No doubt with your skill you make that back real soon.
If you're interested let me know by e-mail: [email protected]
my PayPal ID = [email protected]
If you're interested let me know by e-mail: [email protected]
my PayPal ID = [email protected]
會員從Jan 10, 2011開始
60帖子
會員從Jan 10, 2011開始
60帖子
Feb 07, 2012 at 12:41
會員從Jan 10, 2011開始
60帖子
Hi Steinitz,
I think you misunderstood what I was asking.
I was not indicating that you were about to be wiped out.
My concern was why this trade was being allowed to sit in draw down for so long. Maybe as the others went to TP so quickly the stops on trades were not obvious.
What risk is being taken per trade I guess is what I was trying to get at.
I.e. currently you are 17% down on this one trade (maybe it is now more then 1 trade), yet when it was opened your balance was not as it is now, so based on when it was opened the draw down I think would be more like 23%.
My question is what kind of stops are being used per trade i.e. 30% equity.
Sorry for the confusion on my last post, hopefully this is clearer now.
I think you misunderstood what I was asking.
I was not indicating that you were about to be wiped out.
My concern was why this trade was being allowed to sit in draw down for so long. Maybe as the others went to TP so quickly the stops on trades were not obvious.
What risk is being taken per trade I guess is what I was trying to get at.
I.e. currently you are 17% down on this one trade (maybe it is now more then 1 trade), yet when it was opened your balance was not as it is now, so based on when it was opened the draw down I think would be more like 23%.
My question is what kind of stops are being used per trade i.e. 30% equity.
Sorry for the confusion on my last post, hopefully this is clearer now.
會員從Jan 10, 2011開始
60帖子
Feb 07, 2012 at 19:08
會員從Jan 10, 2011開始
60帖子
It would be helpful if you gave some indication as to what kind of stops are being used (without giving away the whole strategy).. In all honesty the initial performance was great, however it seems the strategy is hold and hope..
Draw down is now 30% of current balance..
As much as the wins look good, I would be hesitant to spend $500, without further knowledge on what I am learning..
Considering the current draw down we are seeing.
Draw down is now 30% of current balance..
As much as the wins look good, I would be hesitant to spend $500, without further knowledge on what I am learning..
Considering the current draw down we are seeing.
會員從Feb 01, 2012開始
15帖子
Feb 08, 2012 at 07:18
會員從Feb 01, 2012開始
15帖子
Why anyone would spend $500 in order to find out your stop loss? I agree that it is a hold and hope strategy. The results look good only for newbies. If you are a veteran trader, you know it is a trick to get people to pay you for a high risk system that will blow your account at some point.
Feb 08, 2012 at 07:30
會員從Jan 14, 2010開始
8帖子
Probably because this is a demo account. Attention is naturally bit low on demo. It's a virtual money for god sake. I know the system well. Try trading it on a real account with use of the normal close on loss rules, steinitz. Show them what the system are made of.
會員從Feb 01, 2012開始
15帖子
會員從Feb 01, 2012開始
15帖子
會員從Feb 01, 2012開始
15帖子
會員從Feb 01, 2012開始
15帖子
Feb 08, 2012 at 09:08
(已編輯Feb 08, 2012 at 09:18)
會員從Feb 01, 2012開始
15帖子
Steinitz, do yu understand that people use their hard earned money to get your systems? The worst thing is that you are killing their hopes by selling craps. You might be making money by selling not trading but you are scamming straight to hell (what goes around, comes around!). Your greed is getting worse. You know what, life is not so easy, the downfall is around the corner for greedy people.
*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。