robominer (由 brado)
該使用者已經刪除了這個系統。
Edit Your Comment
robominer討論
會員從Aug 20, 2009開始
216帖子
Sep 17, 2009 at 13:01
會員從Aug 20, 2009開始
216帖子
Not really he isn't closing his losing trades - not a single one in fact it seems. This is fraud, it gives the illusion being able to trade
but in real life you won't just allow a losing trade to keep on escalating. There should be some sort of marker to flag this in the stats page. If the losing trades are factored in his account is running at a loss.
but in real life you won't just allow a losing trade to keep on escalating. There should be some sort of marker to flag this in the stats page. If the losing trades are factored in his account is running at a loss.
forex_trader_1363
會員從Oct 03, 2009開始
27帖子
Oct 03, 2009 at 12:39
會員從Oct 03, 2009開始
27帖子
agreed stephanusR you have to factor in the open losing trades - and these should be much more transparent on this site than having to deduct equity value from the balance..having said that robominer is actually profitable but no way near as high as this summary suggests..
forex_trader_1363
會員從Oct 03, 2009開始
27帖子
Oct 03, 2009 at 13:00
會員從Oct 03, 2009開始
27帖子
correction to above - they should offer a figure representing the current account equity vs deposit which is the crucial factor i.e. how much you have actually won or lost.
Equity percentage is simply the current equity expressed against the maximum equity to date.
Equity percentage is simply the current equity expressed against the maximum equity to date.
會員從Aug 20, 2009開始
216帖子
Oct 10, 2009 at 17:07
會員從Aug 20, 2009開始
216帖子
petersurrey posted:
correction to above - they should offer a figure representing the current account equity vs deposit which is the crucial factor i.e. how much you have actually won or lost.
Equity percentage is simply the current equity expressed against the maximum equity to date.
This issue has been brought up multiple times and still hasn't been fixed. What matters is how much money will you get back on closing the account and all trades which is $28 518. The deposit was $25 197 and thus the gain is: 13% and not 154% or 122%(abs gain). The request that was made to the site owners was that the an accurate reflection of the system perfomance is given as a %, there should be no need to drag a calculator closes and manually calculate. The difference between 13% and 122% is simply preposterous .
*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。