QuantStrategyEA
| 收益: | +42.31% |
| 縮減 | 50.37% |
| 點: | 137.4 |
| 交易 | 206 |
| 贏得: |
|
| 損失:。 |
|
| 類型: | 真實 |
| 杠杆率: | 1:500 |
| 交易: | 自動的 |
QuantStrategyEA討論
Feb 28, 2013 at 06:58
1,035流覽
6 Replies
Aug 07, 2013 at 20:25
Cant possibly remain profitable into the future. His losses are 2x his wins. So, he needs to win 2 trades for every one trade he loses just to break even. So his break even point is 66% wins and thats not including commissions and slippage. At best, his system should be showing only a small profit. The figures dont add up.
forex_trader_29148
會員從Feb 11, 2011開始
1768帖子
Sep 16, 2013 at 20:38
(已編輯Sep 16, 2013 at 20:38)
conorp posted:aaaaagree with that
Cant possibly remain profitable into the future. His losses are 2x his wins. So, he needs to win 2 trades for every one trade he loses just to break even. So his break even point is 66% wins and thats not including commissions and slippage. At best, his system should be showing only a small profit. The figures dont add up.
會員從Feb 06, 2012開始
1帖子
Oct 03, 2013 at 07:20
losses vs wins are not the only criterion of profitability, because system has SL bigger than PT it also has bigger win probability, over 66%.
The EA works in a backtest, it works in over a year of live trading, I don't worry that it will work also in the future.
The EA works in a backtest, it works in over a year of live trading, I don't worry that it will work also in the future.
會員從Apr 13, 2012開始
1帖子
Oct 17, 2013 at 07:48
hello your good system
*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍，並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示：發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中！
提示：鍵入@符號，自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。
