Fast Forex Millions (由 birt)

收益: -11.74%
縮減 26.10%
點: 343.3
交易 1104
贏得:
損失:。
類型: 真實
杠杆率: 1:100
交易: 自動的

Fast Forex Millions討論

Jan 20, 2012 at 18:10
8,736流覽
88 Replies
會員從Oct 04, 2010開始   46帖子
May 22, 2012 at 07:56
stoped using that
會員從Jan 20, 2012開始   7帖子
Jul 13, 2012 at 14:56
I threw $200 when I bought this EA and I can't get it back....
會員從Jan 20, 2012開始   7帖子
Jul 13, 2012 at 14:57
Support is not working ...
SanandaJmmanuel
forex_trader_59378
會員從Jan 11, 2012開始   27帖子
Jul 13, 2012 at 17:23 (已編輯Jul 13, 2012 at 17:25)
EA are there to cheat people's money mainly, its all about marketing the product, if you cannot trade as fast as a robot like a scalper. scalper is also high frequency trading means higher change to lose money as well when you keep changing side. then its time to learn price action on daily chart.

Price action on daily chart often may have up to 75% hit rates of success.

Please learn that CHARTS on the backtest are total different from LIVE! results on backtest is of no use! Please learn that! if you want to try a ea, please do it live. and see its reaction, you also need to control the EA trading hours, especially during heavily volatility.

I did more than 50 Ea tests, and none can do well under LIVE, not even MDP can do well either, hitting stop loss non-stops. So, its very determined by the speed, broker and etc, as well as the live rate, requotes and slippage.

So some EA may work for someone, while suck on others.

I personally don't recommend buying ea online, since its all marketing a product and cheating money. EA must be customized, optimized.
會員從Nov 18, 2011開始   18帖子
Sep 04, 2012 at 20:48
There are a few commercial EAs whose real time execution comes very close to what you get from a back test and are truly profitable, but there are just a tiny number of them in the market and they are based on the nature of the pair traded, you still have to keep on optimizing them but they are proving to be resilient and produce a stable return.


FFM seems to have been taylor made to do well until Dec. 2011 and from that point it just crashed. There was no amount of optimizing that could revive it.


MDP was very profitable but it was an all out assault on the brokers so they reacted by widening the spread and delaying execution during spikes and in the end nobody could use it anymore, it became impossible to trade. Perhaps it would have been better for the author to keep it just to himself ad get a stable return over the years.

I hope that the seller will come up with an EA that we can really depend on.
stevewalker
forex_trader_79941
會員從Jun 06, 2012開始   1439帖子
Sep 04, 2012 at 21:10
Fact : extreemly curve fitting BT.
Matter : Fail on FT.

no surprise.

walker


會員從Aug 26, 2009開始   166帖子
Sep 18, 2012 at 14:15
stevewalker posted:
Fact : extreemly curve fitting BT.
Matter : Fail on FT.

Completely agree. Unfortunately, the backtest curve fitting did not become apparent until many months after the launch. I stopped the forward test as soon as I received compelling evidence about it.
stevewalker
forex_trader_79941
會員從Jun 06, 2012開始   1439帖子
Sep 18, 2012 at 14:33
😄
I am fan of your FT s.

keep up the good work.

good luck!

walker.

birt posted:
stevewalker posted:
Fact : extreemly curve fitting BT.
Matter : Fail on FT.

Completely agree. Unfortunately, the backtest curve fitting did not become apparent until many months after the launch. I stopped the forward test as soon as I received compelling evidence about it.
會員從Aug 19, 2012開始   34帖子
Dec 01, 2012 at 06:08 (已編輯Dec 01, 2012 at 06:09)
u know an EA is crap if brit has given up!
Get Rich or Die Trying
登錄 / 註冊 to comment
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。