Aggressive (由 forex_trader_447532)
該使用者已經刪除了這個系統。
Edit Your Comment
Aggressive 討論
會員從May 02, 2020開始
1帖子
會員從Oct 30, 2020開始
4帖子
![](/userimages.jpg?uid=447532&id=908805&w=100&h=100)
forex_trader_447532
會員從Jul 27, 2017開始
14帖子
Jan 02, 2021 at 21:24
會員從Jul 27, 2017開始
14帖子
hey everyone, a pleasure to have you here
this result of manual trading for a couple of days, it's not consistent if systemically done over a longer period, and what good a profit is if we cannot keep it grow ..
so I advise you to take a look at my profile and disregard all the systems before Meta Level sys everything before Meta level is below meta level in term of not only profit but consistency which is more important, I advise you look at meta level losses, not profits, cuz a good prediction of how a system will perform in the future comes from analyzing how it manages the losing trades not how much profits it's making right now or will make in the future , although you would see eventually that good management of losses directly reflect great profits over time, it's not about if it can lose trades or cant "profit-trade in %" cuz it will lose and every real systematic operation will lose some trades no matter how good is it, Meta level not only have an edge over the market and high-profit trade in %, it uses order types at price and time that systematically advantages from market structure to avoid market crises and abnormal slippages, in fact, we exploit those to the maximum to our advantages when they occur,
in conclusion, Meta level EA is actually the meta level of automated algorithms that can manage money on a small/medium scale.
FYI Meta level strategy is an upgrade of Executioner EA strategy so it can cover the huge cost of scalp trading real servers of brokers and by the cost, i mean real market price slippage + floating spread + fixed entry commission per lot
profile link : https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Casper9sep
hope this adds some value to your beautiful minds
Regards
this result of manual trading for a couple of days, it's not consistent if systemically done over a longer period, and what good a profit is if we cannot keep it grow ..
so I advise you to take a look at my profile and disregard all the systems before Meta Level sys everything before Meta level is below meta level in term of not only profit but consistency which is more important, I advise you look at meta level losses, not profits, cuz a good prediction of how a system will perform in the future comes from analyzing how it manages the losing trades not how much profits it's making right now or will make in the future , although you would see eventually that good management of losses directly reflect great profits over time, it's not about if it can lose trades or cant "profit-trade in %" cuz it will lose and every real systematic operation will lose some trades no matter how good is it, Meta level not only have an edge over the market and high-profit trade in %, it uses order types at price and time that systematically advantages from market structure to avoid market crises and abnormal slippages, in fact, we exploit those to the maximum to our advantages when they occur,
in conclusion, Meta level EA is actually the meta level of automated algorithms that can manage money on a small/medium scale.
FYI Meta level strategy is an upgrade of Executioner EA strategy so it can cover the huge cost of scalp trading real servers of brokers and by the cost, i mean real market price slippage + floating spread + fixed entry commission per lot
profile link : https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Casper9sep
hope this adds some value to your beautiful minds
Regards
![](/statistics/utv.jpg?id=1505512&r=0.6274322358039384)
*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。