Pulsator - EUR/USD 10 years (由 numa)
The user has deleted this strategy.
Edit Your Comment
Pulsator - EUR/USD 10 years討論
May 15, 2011 at 20:24
會員從Feb 23, 2011開始
16帖子
Hi, yes I would be happy to share my EA.
However, before I give a version to anybody, I'll test it rigorously over a couple of months in a real forward test.
Anybody who wants a free version simply let me know here and I'll contact you as soon as my forward test on a real account had run a couple of months successfully.
However, before I give a version to anybody, I'll test it rigorously over a couple of months in a real forward test.
Anybody who wants a free version simply let me know here and I'll contact you as soon as my forward test on a real account had run a couple of months successfully.
會員從Dec 20, 2010開始
2帖子
May 18, 2011 at 14:29
會員從May 16, 2011開始
8帖子
Hi, can someone let me know how to analyze/using the EA test result in this system tool? I had created the demo and real profile and successfully published but I don't know how to do the same for strategy tester result..😐
The Risk keep me trading...The Pips keep me coming....The Profit keep me going...
May 22, 2011 at 12:18
會員從Feb 23, 2011開始
16帖子
Hi,
no this is not a scalper strategy. Personally I don't think scalping can be successfull on the long run since it's your brokers money which you earn ;-)
My strategy here is based on detecting repeating oszillations and and an impuls that breaks out in one or the other direction is used as basis for a signal.
Regards
no this is not a scalper strategy. Personally I don't think scalping can be successfull on the long run since it's your brokers money which you earn ;-)
My strategy here is based on detecting repeating oszillations and and an impuls that breaks out in one or the other direction is used as basis for a signal.
Regards
May 23, 2011 at 22:50
會員從Feb 19, 2011開始
2帖子
Hello numa,
I think that the fundamental risk is much higher when the trade is more than one day open. I saw in your tradehistory that your stategie held some trade open for a long time. Do you calculate your stop loss dynamicaly ? How about your TP-Strategie.
I produced some EA's with different functionality. Some scalper and some trendsystems. Each system has his own Character.
Tell me more about your Close-Strategie.
Regards
HPHanke
I think that the fundamental risk is much higher when the trade is more than one day open. I saw in your tradehistory that your stategie held some trade open for a long time. Do you calculate your stop loss dynamicaly ? How about your TP-Strategie.
I produced some EA's with different functionality. Some scalper and some trendsystems. Each system has his own Character.
Tell me more about your Close-Strategie.
Regards
HPHanke
May 27, 2011 at 23:51
會員從Feb 23, 2011開始
16帖子
HI HPHanke,
well, the average duration time is between 0.5 and 2 days. Since the EA is trading on the 15 minutes time scale this is a a reasonable duration. Long open trades are rare as one of the goals was to i) minimize the number of open trades at all and ii) to minimize the open time. Exceptions are made however if the trades are within the winning zone even if a trailing s/l may be hit. In these cases, the longer open time only shows the length of the trend that was successfully recognized. You could easily verify my statement regarding the maximum drawback of only 6%.
Regards
Numa
well, the average duration time is between 0.5 and 2 days. Since the EA is trading on the 15 minutes time scale this is a a reasonable duration. Long open trades are rare as one of the goals was to i) minimize the number of open trades at all and ii) to minimize the open time. Exceptions are made however if the trades are within the winning zone even if a trailing s/l may be hit. In these cases, the longer open time only shows the length of the trend that was successfully recognized. You could easily verify my statement regarding the maximum drawback of only 6%.
Regards
Numa
會員從May 24, 2011開始
7帖子
May 29, 2011 at 20:01
(已編輯May 29, 2011 at 20:12)
會員從Feb 23, 2011開始
16帖子
Hi A7_MaD,
thank you for your feedback.
A 'model quality of 0.0%' simply indicates that *no* modeling and optimization was performed.
MetaTrader allows to optimize your input parameters during a backtest and terms this brute-force search for best parameters 'modeling'. However, the problem is the following: If your EA is highly depending on input parameters it is very likely that it is well fitted for the past, but will likely fail in the future if trends/markets change. Therefore, my goal was to build an EA which is as parameter-invariant as possible. In addition, I did not performed any optimization (which is not possible for 10 years anyways without super-computer power). The result is an EA which is *not* the best with regard to maximum win, but shows on average a stable positive result and a low risk profile.
thank you for your feedback.
A 'model quality of 0.0%' simply indicates that *no* modeling and optimization was performed.
MetaTrader allows to optimize your input parameters during a backtest and terms this brute-force search for best parameters 'modeling'. However, the problem is the following: If your EA is highly depending on input parameters it is very likely that it is well fitted for the past, but will likely fail in the future if trends/markets change. Therefore, my goal was to build an EA which is as parameter-invariant as possible. In addition, I did not performed any optimization (which is not possible for 10 years anyways without super-computer power). The result is an EA which is *not* the best with regard to maximum win, but shows on average a stable positive result and a low risk profile.
forex_trader_38776
會員從Jun 10, 2011開始
26帖子
Jun 10, 2011 at 13:13
會員從Jun 10, 2011開始
26帖子
I wish to test your EA. Pls contact my email '[email protected]'. thks.
*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。