正在加载...
继续访问Myfxbook.com
继续访问Myfxbook.com
Čeština
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Indonesia
Latviešu
Melayu
Polski
Português(Brasil)
Português(Portugal)
Slovenčina
Svenska
Türkçe
Vietnamese
Русский
हिंदी
ไทย
日本語
简体字
繁體中文
한국어
登录
注册
Open an account with FOREX.com
FX Tools:
经济日历
Interest Rates
FX Calculators
新闻
价差
情绪
外汇热力图
相关性
Market Hours
帖子作者：forex_trader_169857
1
..
5
6
7
8
9
1
..
6
..
9
Forex Contest Squared Financial
在
竞赛
中
Aug 06, 2014 at 09:43
I'm unsure why he is complaining. His account shows that he got a deposit of $100,000 and not $10,000 as he alleged.
Profit Empire Robot
在
交易系统
中
Jul 31, 2014 at 04:48
Absolutely, whilst a cent account statement is visually identical to a standard account statement, roboforex does assign specific series of account numbers which are unique to each type of account. From the statement below, the account number for PER is 728319. Following this lead, the account type is determined to be a roboforex pro cent account.www.myfxbook.com/statements/737501/statement.html
Profit Empire Robot
在
交易系统
中
Jul 29, 2014 at 12:51
Interesting that you know just because you were subscriber. As a subscriber were you given access to login to the PER master account via the investor password of the MT4 platform? If yes, what attributed you to say that it's a standard account? If no, what other possible factors prompted you to make that claim?
Profit Empire Robot
在
交易系统
中
Jul 28, 2014 at 13:00
Another fallacy of yours. When a transfer is made from another currency to an USD account, the scenario you mentioned would occurred. It'd never even up with .00 due to the exchange rate regardless if it's cents or not. Take a look at the cent account in the link below. Multiple deposits and withdrawals that justified you are wrong a 2nd time. http://www.myfxbook.com/members/svslob/roboforexprocent/786222
Profit Empire Robot
在
交易系统
中
Jul 28, 2014 at 11:00
Dispelling the fallacies of your notion and calculation, below is a link to a cent account. Your assertion is erroneous, there's no difference regardless if it's cents or not: http://www.myfxbook.com/members/dindinaq/roboforex-pro-cent/773008
Profit Empire Robot
在
交易系统
中
Jul 28, 2014 at 05:56
Extreme smart undoubtedly. This is just a cent account. No worries if it blows. Laughing all the way to the bank with the profits made from the subscriptions. I should be banned from posting in this thread after this. 😀
Reasons for EURUSD 600 pips drop 22-Jul-2014
在
经验丰富的交易员
中
Jul 23, 2014 at 14:21
The 4th digit after the decimal is known as pips regardless if its 5 decimal quote or 4 decimal quote. 1 pip = 10 points. If its referred to as 600 on a 5 decimal quotes broker, then it's called 600 points not 600 pips.
Reasons for EURUSD 600 pips drop 22-Jul-2014
在
经验丰富的交易员
中
Jul 23, 2014 at 13:44
Yes, the high of my broker was 1.35290 and the low was 1.34590 so the range of the day was 70 pips.
Reasons for EURUSD 600 pips drop 22-Jul-2014
在
经验丰富的交易员
中
Jul 23, 2014 at 06:49
Maybe there's a problem with your broker. The range on my broker was only about 70 pips.
Do you think you can turn $200 into $400 in six weeks?
在
新手交易员
中
Jul 20, 2014 at 06:10
www.myfxbook.com/members/ApexRevenueLLC/gold/920983
GoldStreamEA
在
交易系统
中
Jul 14, 2014 at 10:26
Why have you not verified your account despite the numerous requests that you do so? What are you trying to hide? From the chart that you uploaded above, you had unwitting revealed to the public that you made a deposit of $20408.35 USD without any withdrawals. It appears that you are trying to hide the fact that this is a demo account rather than a real account as stated in your portfolio. Until you verify your account or make some withdrawals to justify it's a real account, I remain to be corrected.
Do you think you can turn $200 into $400 in six weeks?
在
新手交易员
中
Jul 12, 2014 at 17:08
I understand your premise perfectly. I wasn't asking for hypothesis based on a fanciful stretch of imagination from you. I was merely asking you to attach a chart depicting the 50 pips gap you alleged occured on Nov 7 2013. Since you offered no relevant or tangible charts to support your case, I cease to pursue this matter any further.Cheers..
Do you think you can turn $200 into $400 in six weeks?
在
新手交易员
中
Jul 12, 2014 at 13:17
To put it into perspective, here's an illustration of a 'gap'..http://www.myfxbook.com/files/MyFxTrader/gapexample_kH.gif
Do you think you can turn $200 into $400 in six weeks?
在
新手交易员
中
Jul 12, 2014 at 08:43
Thanks, looking at the chart you posted, I see that you regard a 'spike' to be a 'gap'..
Do you think you can turn $200 into $400 in six weeks?
在
新手交易员
中
Jul 11, 2014 at 19:53
Please attach the chart for ease of reference.
Do you think you can turn $200 into $400 in six weeks?
在
新手交易员
中
Jul 09, 2014 at 10:13
Yes, if you are talking about progressive grid martingale. But there are various type of martingales; for example static break-out, reverse progression or even the flip coin type..
150K to 1MIO Reloaded
在
交易系统
中
Jul 04, 2014 at 12:51
That's not what he mentioned in his blog:-http://www.private-trading.com/search?updated-min=2014-07-01T00:00:00%2B02:00&updated-max=2014-08-01T00:00:00%2B02:00&max-results=1
Johnpaul77
在
交易系统
中
Jul 03, 2014 at 13:42
Very nice roller-coaster..
Do you think you can turn $200 into $400 in six weeks?
在
新手交易员
中
Jun 29, 2014 at 13:10
200 consecutive trades? Hmm, interesting math.. 😲
Sapphire
在
交易系统
中
Jun 25, 2014 at 14:23
I reckon that separates a gambler from a trader.. That just reaffirmed that I'm of that ilk [gambler].. 😉Cheers..
You have an Ad Blocker!
Myfxbook is a site supported by advertisements. Here are two ways for you to continue browsing:
Ad Free Subscription
或
Disable your Ad Blocker
Already subscribed?
登录
您没有登录
此功能仅适用于注册会员。
注册是免费的，只需不到一分钟。
点击注册按钮继续。
除非您已经是会员并享受我们的服务，否则只需登录。
Keep up to date with the markets
Enable notifications to receive real-time important market updates:
经济日历
外汇新闻
You can disable notifications at any time from your browser.
Unblock Notifications
You've blocked browser notifications for Myfxbook.com. Please enable it:
You can disable notifications at any time from your browser.
以前
共识
实际
