JourneyFX (由 JourneyFx)
该用户已经删除了这个系统。
JourneyFX讨论
Nov 25, 2010 at 00:35
988浏览
8 Replies
Nov 29, 2010 at 04:31
Please don't write neggative comments about our strategy if you don't know anything about it. And you are wrong this is far from martingale, the system takes partial positions until the full position is opened based on our clients risk tolerence.
Slow and Steady wins the race
forex_trader_16715
会员从Aug 14, 2010开始
219帖子
Nov 29, 2010 at 05:16
BROKER is IBFX: 50:1 and FIFO rules apply.
Can you provide a detailed summary of your strategy to prove your claim?
Can you provide a detailed summary of your strategy to prove your claim?
Nov 29, 2010 at 07:32
(已编辑 Nov 29, 2010 at 07:58)
JourneyFx posted:
Please don't write neggative comments about our strategy if you don't know anything about it. And you are wrong this is far from martingale, the system takes partial positions until the full position is opened based on our clients risk tolerence.
Martingale is not a negative comment. If used correctly it might be a powerful weapon. I just noticed that there are multiple trades with increasing lot size, that's it. In fact I love the fact that you're showing real account with reputable broker.
You cannot deny the fact that you're using martingale methods w/o a SL. Maybe the whole system is something a lot more than martingale but people should know you're using it anyway.
"In trading, winning is frequently a question of luck, but losing is always a matter of skill."
forex_trader_16715
会员从Aug 14, 2010开始
219帖子
Nov 29, 2010 at 07:44
forexma posted:
I just noticed that there are multiple trades with increasing lot size, that's it.
Anyway you cannot deny the fact that you're using martingale methods w/o a SL. Maybe the whole system is something a lot more than martingale but people should know you're using it.
The LOT SIZE is NOW Private.
Way to go 'Solar'
Nov 29, 2010 at 07:59
pipinvestment1 posted:
forexma posted:
I just noticed that there are multiple trades with increasing lot size, that's it.
Anyway you cannot deny the fact that you're using martingale methods w/o a SL. Maybe the whole system is something a lot more than martingale but people should know you're using it.
The LOT SIZE is NOW Private.
Way to go 'Solar'
Lot size was hidden from the beginning but looking at the % change... it was easy to guess.
"In trading, winning is frequently a question of luck, but losing is always a matter of skill."
forex_trader_16715
会员从Aug 14, 2010开始
219帖子
Nov 29, 2010 at 17:27
Smarty! I'm glad MFB finally added that needed statistic.
forex_trader_16715
会员从Aug 14, 2010开始
219帖子
Nov 29, 2010 at 19:05
(已编辑 Nov 29, 2010 at 19:05)
11.02.10 16:00 11.23.10 08:15 NZDJPY Sell 0.00000 0.00000 62.31900 64.09500 -177.6 20d -2.39%
11.04.10 03:17 11.23.10 08:15 NZDJPY Sell 0.00000 0.00000 63.29900 64.09500 -79.6 19d -1.14%
11.19.10 00:54 11.23.10 08:15 NZDJPY Sell 0.00000 0.00000 65.05900 64.09500 96.4 4d 3.49%
More so ''GRID Martingale''
11.04.10 03:17 11.23.10 08:15 NZDJPY Sell 0.00000 0.00000 63.29900 64.09500 -79.6 19d -1.14%
11.19.10 00:54 11.23.10 08:15 NZDJPY Sell 0.00000 0.00000 65.05900 64.09500 96.4 4d 3.49%
More so ''GRID Martingale''
forex_trader_16715
会员从Aug 14, 2010开始
219帖子
Dec 03, 2010 at 14:21
12.02.10 14:55 12.03.10 13:44 GBPCAD Buy 0.00000 1.58100 1.56600 1.57872 127.2 22h 49m 5.15%
11.24.10 13:47 12.03.10 13:44 GBPCAD Buy 0.00000 1.58100 1.60259 1.57870 -238.9 8d -5.14%
-238 pips at 5% and a gain of 127 pips for a 5% gain == Martingale. Why Deny the use of martingale?
Investors should know the truth😀
11.24.10 13:47 12.03.10 13:44 GBPCAD Buy 0.00000 1.58100 1.60259 1.57870 -238.9 8d -5.14%
-238 pips at 5% and a gain of 127 pips for a 5% gain == Martingale. Why Deny the use of martingale?
Investors should know the truth😀
forex_trader_16715
会员从Aug 14, 2010开始
219帖子
Dec 03, 2010 at 14:38
JourneyFx posted:
Please don't write neggative comments about our strategy if you don't know anything about it. And you are wrong this is far from martingale, the system takes partial positions until the full position is opened based on our clients risk tolerence.
Averaging down and doubling up your lot size after a loss are two different styles of trading. Considering that managed accounts are controlled from one master account, Clients would not have control of what you define as 'Risk tolerance'. Therefore, opening additional positions that are twice the sum of the original position declares that you are using martingale as a break even solution. This theory has proven to wipe out accounts in the past and without proper caution this method can be dangerous.
*商业用途和垃圾邮件将不被容忍，并可能导致账户终止。
提示：发布图片/YouTube网址会自动嵌入到您的帖子中！
提示：键入@符号，自动完成参与此讨论的用户名。
