FX Amplified - Nick's Account (ForexSignals.com (由 NickMcDonald)
该用户已经删除了这个系统。
Edit Your Comment
FX Amplified - Nick's Account (ForexSignals.com 讨论
会员从Jan 25, 2010开始
1288帖子
会员从Jul 05, 2011开始
301帖子
会员从Jul 05, 2011开始
301帖子
会员从Jul 05, 2011开始
301帖子
会员从Apr 22, 2010开始
122帖子
会员从Oct 27, 2011开始
59帖子
会员从Jul 05, 2011开始
301帖子
会员从Oct 27, 2011开始
59帖子
会员从Jul 05, 2011开始
301帖子
会员从Jul 05, 2011开始
301帖子
Jul 23, 2013 at 17:21
会员从Jul 05, 2011开始
301帖子
uk_max posted:
shouldn't the drawdown be about 50% and not 25%?
Your account had almost 100% gain ( $8,000 profit ) and now its near 50% gain. Only shows a 25% loss in the month of July while you missed out on 4k profit banked profit 😳
Drawdown is based on the size of the entire account, not just the profits.
会员从Apr 22, 2010开始
122帖子
会员从Apr 22, 2010开始
122帖子
会员从Jul 05, 2011开始
301帖子
Aug 07, 2013 at 20:27
会员从Aug 07, 2013开始
23帖子
Guys,
The chart looked pretty, but this drawdown was inevitable. You cant have an average loss 2x your winner. You will ultimately lose money. It means that you need to have 2 winners for very loser just to break even.
You would be better off talking fewer winners and managing your losses. A robust trading system should have the average winner greater than he average loser. If the w/l ratio was in reverse and focused on having each winner 2x each loser, then you would have a sustainable profitable system. 30% drawdown is unsustainable and will happen again using the current methods.
A small change in the w/l % will cause you to lose money under the current system. Everyone looks for the Holy Grail. Well, here it is. Focus on the average winner being greater than the average loser. Thats the Holy Grail. If your average winner was 2x your average loser, you would only need to have 33% winning trades to break even.
Thats the real deal.
The chart looked pretty, but this drawdown was inevitable. You cant have an average loss 2x your winner. You will ultimately lose money. It means that you need to have 2 winners for very loser just to break even.
You would be better off talking fewer winners and managing your losses. A robust trading system should have the average winner greater than he average loser. If the w/l ratio was in reverse and focused on having each winner 2x each loser, then you would have a sustainable profitable system. 30% drawdown is unsustainable and will happen again using the current methods.
A small change in the w/l % will cause you to lose money under the current system. Everyone looks for the Holy Grail. Well, here it is. Focus on the average winner being greater than the average loser. Thats the Holy Grail. If your average winner was 2x your average loser, you would only need to have 33% winning trades to break even.
Thats the real deal.
会员从Apr 22, 2010开始
122帖子
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8dd4e/8dd4ec0d7e5f4dee2d3deb169c56204bc5cc25c1" alt=""
*商业用途和垃圾邮件将不被容忍,并可能导致账户终止。
提示:发布图片/YouTube网址会自动嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:键入@符号,自动完成参与此讨论的用户名。