Deviator (由 deviator)
收益 : | +150.36% |
缩减 | 75.94% |
点: | 21810.8 |
交易 | 924 |
赢得: |
|
损失:。 |
|
类型: | 演示 |
杠杆率: | 1:200 |
交易: | 自动的 |
Edit Your Comment
Deviator讨论
Apr 08, 2010 at 07:51
(已编辑 Apr 08, 2010 at 07:52)
会员从Apr 07, 2010开始
5帖子
Deviator EA always opens two orders and when sum of them is in profit it closes them both, so usually one order is in profit and the other one is in loss, altogether giving some profit. It is similar principle like famous EURUSD/USDCHF so called 'hedging' (which does not work in the long run) but I use different principle which leads me to the profitable system.
It is a commercial system.
Everybody welcome to take a look!
It is a commercial system.
Everybody welcome to take a look!
会员从Apr 20, 2010开始
814帖子
May 07, 2010 at 11:29
会员从Apr 20, 2010开始
814帖子
Why is that one pair lot size is x2 bigger than other pairs ?
And the bigger lot size pair always has negative pip.
While the smaller lot size pair always has positive pip double than the negative pip.
Is there a way to reverse the lot size of the pair, so it gain more profit ?
So the EA will received the signal to auto trade and we can not control the lot size?
And the bigger lot size pair always has negative pip.
While the smaller lot size pair always has positive pip double than the negative pip.
Is there a way to reverse the lot size of the pair, so it gain more profit ?
So the EA will received the signal to auto trade and we can not control the lot size?
Information is Gold when come to organised.
May 07, 2010 at 11:40
(已编辑 May 07, 2010 at 11:41)
会员从Apr 07, 2010开始
5帖子
ForexSeeker posted:That is my strategy. It is a kind of hedging. One pair moves more-less twice as much as the other.
Why is that one pair lot size is x2 bigger than other pairs ?
There are always two orders open at the same time. If the sum of both reaches my profit target then I close them both - with overall profit, where one can be negative and the other one positive, but positive must be bigger than negative, obviously.
And the bigger lot size pair always has negative pip.
Does not matter which one wins, the sum of both orders PL must be my profit target - positive.
While the smaller lot size pair always has positive pip double than the negative pip.
No, this is my strategy. If you want it to work better, maybe develop your own strategy.
Is there a way to reverse the lot size of the pair, so it gain more profit ?
You can control lot size by setting the lot multiplier factor, e.g. if I have 0.1 lot and your lot multiplier factor is 0.2, then EA opens on your account 0.1 * 0.2 lot = 0.05 lot
So the EA will received the signal to auto trade and we can not control the lot size?
会员从Jan 18, 2010开始
63帖子
会员从Apr 20, 2010开始
814帖子
May 09, 2010 at 00:00
(已编辑 May 09, 2010 at 00:00)
会员从Apr 20, 2010开始
814帖子
??? Correlation strategies got anything to do with spread ??
Only scalping EA that close at small pip or abrigate Ea that stealing 1 or 2 pip only depend on spread.
If you talking about logic trigger affected by spread ? This EA logic not even run on your PC, it just received signal form the master to open trade and close trade.
The only doubt is that can it execute the command as fast as the master ? Surely a fast action take profit EA is unable to use in rent a signal EA.
Only scalping EA that close at small pip or abrigate Ea that stealing 1 or 2 pip only depend on spread.
If you talking about logic trigger affected by spread ? This EA logic not even run on your PC, it just received signal form the master to open trade and close trade.
The only doubt is that can it execute the command as fast as the master ? Surely a fast action take profit EA is unable to use in rent a signal EA.
Information is Gold when come to organised.
*商业用途和垃圾邮件将不被容忍,并可能导致账户终止。
提示:发布图片/YouTube网址会自动嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:键入@符号,自动完成参与此讨论的用户名。