Behemoth USDCHF 5% risk (由 stevetrade)
该用户已将其策略转为私有。
Edit Your Comment
Behemoth USDCHF 5% risk讨论
会员从Oct 28, 2009开始
1430帖子
Jun 29, 2010 at 09:08
会员从Oct 28, 2009开始
1430帖子
This is Behemoth compounded with 5% risk.
Well, I say 5% risk. The lots maxed out and from then on it is fixed lot sizes of 99,999 lots.
Yes, I realise that this is a preposterous lot size but there is really no other way to try and see what the compounding result is.
I realise that the modelling quality - which is caused by using fixed range bars - means that the strategy will only prove itself in live trading and I have already put it live.
Well, I say 5% risk. The lots maxed out and from then on it is fixed lot sizes of 99,999 lots.
Yes, I realise that this is a preposterous lot size but there is really no other way to try and see what the compounding result is.
I realise that the modelling quality - which is caused by using fixed range bars - means that the strategy will only prove itself in live trading and I have already put it live.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
会员从Jun 16, 2010开始
205帖子
会员从Oct 28, 2009开始
1430帖子
Jun 29, 2010 at 10:58
(已编辑 Jun 29, 2010 at 11:04)
会员从Oct 28, 2009开始
1430帖子
Hi Soeren,
You can see the monthly performance in the summary at the bottom. Although the percentage figures are nonsense because I think MyFxBook are calculating from the backtest starting equity rather than the months starting equity you will see that since the beginning of 2007 on this pair there have been only two losing months.
The strategy actually performs better in the recent past due to higher volatility in the markets.
Steve
You can see the monthly performance in the summary at the bottom. Although the percentage figures are nonsense because I think MyFxBook are calculating from the backtest starting equity rather than the months starting equity you will see that since the beginning of 2007 on this pair there have been only two losing months.
The strategy actually performs better in the recent past due to higher volatility in the markets.
Steve
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
*商业用途和垃圾邮件将不被容忍,并可能导致账户终止。
提示:发布图片/YouTube网址会自动嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:键入@符号,自动完成参与此讨论的用户名。