Megadroid risk 0.2 no recovery mode (Genom iamfxfapturbo)
The user has deleted this strategy.
Edit Your Comment
Megadroid risk 0.2 no recovery mode Diskussion
Medlem sedan Feb 12, 2010
12 inlägg
Feb 08, 2014 at 08:14
Medlem sedan Feb 12, 2010
12 inlägg
Hello!
I saw Your Megadroid test and was really exciting.
I have couple questions:
Each Broker are you using?
Can You explain, in 2007 didn't was on the stage this Expert advisor.
How could be the test from 2007.Or maybe with the tester?
Is this real account or demo?
Anyway thank You in advance if You want to answer.
Have a nice day!
VinnieForex
I saw Your Megadroid test and was really exciting.
I have couple questions:
Each Broker are you using?
Can You explain, in 2007 didn't was on the stage this Expert advisor.
How could be the test from 2007.Or maybe with the tester?
Is this real account or demo?
Anyway thank You in advance if You want to answer.
Have a nice day!
VinnieForex
Medlem sedan Dec 22, 2011
18 inlägg
Feb 09, 2014 at 15:33
Medlem sedan Dec 22, 2011
18 inlägg
Hello.
The broker i use is Pepperstone.
It is a real account.
For me, i just wanted to use 5-year-data to see how the EA performs. So 2007 is not important for me at that moment.
I'm no longer use this EA and Pipjet anymore. It performs like the backtest, but sometimes, you can have three stop loss in a row and could bleed your account. It recovers, but it takes a lot of time, so this strategy is not for anyone.
To replace those EA, i have found other and i am pretty happy with my choice.
Thanks.
The broker i use is Pepperstone.
It is a real account.
For me, i just wanted to use 5-year-data to see how the EA performs. So 2007 is not important for me at that moment.
I'm no longer use this EA and Pipjet anymore. It performs like the backtest, but sometimes, you can have three stop loss in a row and could bleed your account. It recovers, but it takes a lot of time, so this strategy is not for anyone.
To replace those EA, i have found other and i am pretty happy with my choice.
Thanks.
Medlem sedan Jun 03, 2010
696 inlägg
Feb 13, 2014 at 18:08
Medlem sedan Jun 03, 2010
696 inlägg
Model Quality 0,0% and 'Control Points only' method.
And You are telling that 'It performs like the backtest' ? Sorry, but who will believe in this? 😁
And You are telling that 'It performs like the backtest' ? Sorry, but who will believe in this? 😁
PAMM MANAGER // Professional Fund Manager
Medlem sedan Jun 03, 2010
696 inlägg
Feb 13, 2014 at 18:27
Medlem sedan Jun 03, 2010
696 inlägg
Ok but even for You it should be not trustful backtest due its bad accuracy.
PAMM MANAGER // Professional Fund Manager
Feb 14, 2014 at 13:49
Medlem sedan Apr 05, 2012
24 inlägg
adrian point was even if just using it for yourself, Model Quality 0,0% = results mean nothing as model quality is BAD,
his only point was advising you that your test does not seem valid - EVEN if ONLY using the results for yourself.
his only point was advising you that your test does not seem valid - EVEN if ONLY using the results for yourself.
Medlem sedan Jun 03, 2010
696 inlägg
Feb 14, 2014 at 15:35
Medlem sedan Jun 03, 2010
696 inlägg
Did he jamm himself?
dupapa - right point !
dupapa - right point !
PAMM MANAGER // Professional Fund Manager
*Kommersiell användning och skräppost tolereras inte och kan leda till att kontot avslutas.
Tips: Om du lägger upp en bild/youtube-adress bäddas den automatiskt in i ditt inlägg!
Tips: Skriv @-tecknet för att automatiskt komplettera ett användarnamn som deltar i den här diskussionen.