XPipsTrendMulti (By pc8multifx)
Пользователь удалил эту систему.
XPipsTrendMulti Обсуждение
Участник с Sep 04, 2009
879 комментариев
Mar 08, 2010 at 17:22
Targeted ROI of 20 % in less than 2 month(36 trading days) almost hit. Multi-pair trading seems to offer higher return and less DD, with appropriate risk set up, than single pair trading.
Since it can be backtested, time has to tell....😎
Since it can be backtested, time has to tell....😎
Участник с Sep 04, 2009
879 комментариев
May 07, 2010 at 02:28
Flawless performance even under the craziest market conditions....😎
78 trading days and 44% ROI
Max DD 2.12%
The right candidate for managed account.
78 trading days and 44% ROI
Max DD 2.12%
The right candidate for managed account.
Участник с Sep 04, 2009
879 комментариев
May 12, 2010 at 15:29
This more than 1000 $ profit happened by a server down time of several hours...😲
When the server went back some of the open positions have been in huge profit😝
Conclusion: the more the broker fu(ks up, the better for the system LOL😎
When the server went back some of the open positions have been in huge profit😝
Conclusion: the more the broker fu(ks up, the better for the system LOL😎
forex_trader_7
Участник с Aug 01, 2009
941 комментариев
May 12, 2010 at 16:37
I looked at that hey, and there weren't any big moves on the pairs. Today was a catatonic day.
But I did notice this before while offshore, throw in the trades, check 12 hours later. Best trades ever. Once a day, maybe every 24 hours...
But I did notice this before while offshore, throw in the trades, check 12 hours later. Best trades ever. Once a day, maybe every 24 hours...
Участник с Sep 04, 2009
879 комментариев
May 12, 2010 at 17:01
(отредактировано May 12, 2010 at 17:02)
Exactly, two fat sells on G/U made the systems day...
but it could have been the other way around and on the reopening there could have been a heavy DD. But it wouldn't matter (no SL there to get hit), since the system is full adaptive it would just trade as usual til TP is reached.
but it could have been the other way around and on the reopening there could have been a heavy DD. But it wouldn't matter (no SL there to get hit), since the system is full adaptive it would just trade as usual til TP is reached.
Участник с Sep 12, 2009
313 комментариев
May 14, 2010 at 12:26
IT LOOKS LIKE MARTINAGALE BECAUSE TOTAL PIPS Are negative
Участник с Sep 04, 2009
879 комментариев
May 14, 2010 at 14:12
(отредактировано May 14, 2010 at 14:26)
So what? Look at YOUR negative pips... Mine is working at least😝
U can't buy food, cars and houses with pips. I trade to earn MONEY !
U can't buy food, cars and houses with pips. I trade to earn MONEY !
Участник с Feb 25, 2010
29 комментариев
May 22, 2010 at 13:38
pc8multifx posted:
Exactly, two fat sells on G/U made the systems day...
but it could have been the other way around and on the reopening there could have been a heavy DD. But it wouldn't matter (no SL there to get hit), since the system is full adaptive it would just trade as usual til TP is reached.
Hi Pc8multifx,
During 'heavy' drawdown, is hedge the way your EA keep margin at good levels?
Участник с Sep 04, 2009
879 комментариев
May 22, 2010 at 14:11
No.
For me the definition of heavy DD(10-15%) is probably different from yours.
For me the definition of heavy DD(10-15%) is probably different from yours.
Участник с Feb 25, 2010
29 комментариев
May 22, 2010 at 16:08
(отредактировано May 22, 2010 at 16:09)
Yes thats possible, let say it this way:
Assume this situation: The price of GBP/USD keeps trending down heavily against your open position in GBP/USD (while your EA has a floating 6th martingale step open in GBP/USD), is hedge the way your EA keep margin still at good levels?
Or perhaps the EA has no hedge capability at all? Wondering how does it maintain good margin level?
Assume this situation: The price of GBP/USD keeps trending down heavily against your open position in GBP/USD (while your EA has a floating 6th martingale step open in GBP/USD), is hedge the way your EA keep margin still at good levels?
Or perhaps the EA has no hedge capability at all? Wondering how does it maintain good margin level?
Участник с Sep 04, 2009
879 комментариев
May 24, 2010 at 13:57
70% ROI after 92 trading days DD 2.28%😎
Участник с May 26, 2010
4 комментариев
May 31, 2010 at 15:38
great work you've done here.. do you mind sharing your strategy?
Участник с Sep 04, 2009
879 комментариев
May 31, 2010 at 15:46
Thx. This EA is private and made to managing account
Участник с May 26, 2010
4 комментариев
May 31, 2010 at 16:22
no worries. keep it up.
Участник с Sep 04, 2009
879 комментариев
May 31, 2010 at 16:37
I'll do my very best 😄
Участник с May 16, 2010
9 комментариев
Jul 02, 2010 at 00:51
Good effort.
You described this system as multi pair adaptive martingale.
It was not clear what you mean with the term 'Adaptive' in regard to this multi pair Martingale?
You described this system as multi pair adaptive martingale.
It was not clear what you mean with the term 'Adaptive' in regard to this multi pair Martingale?
Участник с Sep 04, 2009
879 комментариев
Jul 02, 2010 at 01:16
The correct English term has to be adaptable, I think. It means, it doesnt trade with a fix pip step, this leads usually to the famous sudden death of marty systems in strong trending market.
Участник с May 01, 2010
272 комментариев
Jul 03, 2010 at 02:15
(отредактировано Jul 03, 2010 at 02:16)
Hi PC8,
How come no REAL accounts for all your systems? They seem good, or do you not risk your own capital?
I see a lot of systems on here that do this and that, but they tend not to run on REAL accounts, and always seem to be seeking outside investor funds. I don't mean to challenge you or bag on you as your returns are great, but curious why the no real MONEY systems are seeking so much capital for managed accounts... :) Or the systems HIDE everything they can which makes no sense for transparency purposes.
Why waste time w/ demo accounts and pretend when you can trade your real dollars and get investors to join you? I know I would if your returns are truly REAL and you can show it and make it easy for all to join. Other systems have strange brokers that are basically resellers, but your systems seem to be quite good. (If you think about it, if you show how much you are trading $$$, what trades you have open, etc.. then you have something people can truly trust)
Do you plan on taking these live in the future?
How come no REAL accounts for all your systems? They seem good, or do you not risk your own capital?
I see a lot of systems on here that do this and that, but they tend not to run on REAL accounts, and always seem to be seeking outside investor funds. I don't mean to challenge you or bag on you as your returns are great, but curious why the no real MONEY systems are seeking so much capital for managed accounts... :) Or the systems HIDE everything they can which makes no sense for transparency purposes.
Why waste time w/ demo accounts and pretend when you can trade your real dollars and get investors to join you? I know I would if your returns are truly REAL and you can show it and make it easy for all to join. Other systems have strange brokers that are basically resellers, but your systems seem to be quite good. (If you think about it, if you show how much you are trading $$$, what trades you have open, etc.. then you have something people can truly trust)
Do you plan on taking these live in the future?
Be Open, honest and ethical and all the $$$ you want will come. (hint hint)
Участник с Sep 04, 2009
879 комментариев
Jul 14, 2010 at 01:49
7th month, 100 % ROI 😎
Участник с Mar 07, 2010
257 комментариев
Jul 14, 2010 at 03:17
also you had more systems than 2 ... where did they go ?
