FAPTURBO_ICHIMOKU_aggressive (By FAPTURBO)
Прибыль : | +13.0% |
Просадка | 16.56% |
Пипс: | 209.3 |
Сделки | 409 |
Выигрыш: |
|
Потери: |
|
Тип: | Реальный |
Кредитное плечо: | 1:100 |
Трейдинг: | Автоматически |
Edit Your Comment
FAPTURBO_ICHIMOKU_aggressive Обсуждение
Участник с Aug 27, 2009
31 комментариев
Dec 17, 2011 at 04:43
Участник с Aug 27, 2009
31 комментариев
Hello,
do you use MM ? If yes, by default at 5% on each pair ?
Thanks.
do you use MM ? If yes, by default at 5% on each pair ?
Thanks.
Участник с Dec 07, 2009
134 комментариев
Jan 11, 2012 at 01:04
Участник с Dec 07, 2009
134 комментариев
It is at 3% MM.
Be afraid, very afraid?
Участник с Sep 01, 2011
27 комментариев
Jan 11, 2012 at 01:20
Участник с Sep 01, 2011
27 комментариев
hy
r u using defult settings?
thx
r u using defult settings?
thx
Участник с Sep 01, 2011
27 комментариев
Участник с May 26, 2011
9 комментариев
Jan 22, 2012 at 04:41
Участник с May 26, 2011
9 комментариев
Have you tried MM:y, LRR: 25, Aggressive:y for all pairs?
Участник с Dec 07, 2009
134 комментариев
Jan 22, 2012 at 15:26
Участник с Dec 07, 2009
134 комментариев
What kind of fool would put that high of risk on a large real money account using an EA?
Be afraid, very afraid?
Участник с May 26, 2011
9 комментариев
Jan 22, 2012 at 22:10
Участник с May 26, 2011
9 комментариев
So your answer is no.
The default LRR for Ichimoku is 5.
Does 'It is at 3% MM' mean that your LRR is at 3? You clearly do not want to go as high as 25.
The default LRR for Ichimoku is 5.
Does 'It is at 3% MM' mean that your LRR is at 3? You clearly do not want to go as high as 25.
Участник с Dec 07, 2009
134 комментариев
Jan 22, 2012 at 22:19
Участник с Dec 07, 2009
134 комментариев
It is not my account but I do know that Mike from FAP Turbo has it at 3% with aggressive 'true'. 25% would suck up huge equity even at 500:1 leverage and possibly blow the account. On this EA 2% means the actual risk to the account and not the amount of equity being used and so to risk 25% of the account with tight stops that it uses would most certainly destroy the account.
Be afraid, very afraid?
Участник с May 26, 2011
9 комментариев
Jan 22, 2012 at 23:36
Участник с May 26, 2011
9 комментариев
Here are a few of the losses...
10/14/2011, 00:42 @ -2.65%
10/14/2011, 02:54 @ -2.24%
10/18/2011, 02:35 @ -2.67%
10/25/2011, 00:22 @ -2.73%
10/25/2011, 04:33 @ -2.64%
It seems that at an average this account would lose, at most, 2.5% on any single trade. Combine that with a 91% win ratio and this system looks really good.
10/14/2011, 00:42 @ -2.65%
10/14/2011, 02:54 @ -2.24%
10/18/2011, 02:35 @ -2.67%
10/25/2011, 00:22 @ -2.73%
10/25/2011, 04:33 @ -2.64%
It seems that at an average this account would lose, at most, 2.5% on any single trade. Combine that with a 91% win ratio and this system looks really good.
Участник с May 26, 2011
9 комментариев
Feb 17, 2012 at 05:16
Участник с May 26, 2011
9 комментариев
Any ideas when this drawdown is expected to reverse? I'm already counting the months of January and February as losses.
Участник с Dec 07, 2009
134 комментариев
May 01, 2012 at 12:26
Участник с Dec 07, 2009
134 комментариев
Looks like the poor win vs. loss ratio is the undoing of this robot. Too bad after such a hopeful start.
Be afraid, very afraid?
*Коммерческое использование и спам не допускаются и могут привести к аннулированию аккаунта.
Совет: Размещенные изображения или ссылки на Youtube автоматически вставляются в ваше сообщение!
Совет: введите знак @ для автоматического заполнения имени пользователя, участвующего в этом обсуждении.