XPipsTrendMulti (Od pc8multifx)
Użytkownik usunął ten system.
XPipsTrendMulti Omówić
Uczestnik z Sep 04, 2009
879 postów
Mar 08, 2010 at 17:22
Targeted ROI of 20 % in less than 2 month(36 trading days) almost hit. Multi-pair trading seems to offer higher return and less DD, with appropriate risk set up, than single pair trading.
Since it can be backtested, time has to tell....😎
Since it can be backtested, time has to tell....😎
Uczestnik z Sep 04, 2009
879 postów
May 07, 2010 at 02:28
Flawless performance even under the craziest market conditions....😎
78 trading days and 44% ROI
Max DD 2.12%
The right candidate for managed account.
78 trading days and 44% ROI
Max DD 2.12%
The right candidate for managed account.
Uczestnik z Sep 04, 2009
879 postów
May 12, 2010 at 15:29
This more than 1000 $ profit happened by a server down time of several hours...😲
When the server went back some of the open positions have been in huge profit😝
Conclusion: the more the broker fu(ks up, the better for the system LOL😎
When the server went back some of the open positions have been in huge profit😝
Conclusion: the more the broker fu(ks up, the better for the system LOL😎
forex_trader_7
Uczestnik z Aug 01, 2009
941 postów
May 12, 2010 at 16:37
I looked at that hey, and there weren't any big moves on the pairs. Today was a catatonic day.
But I did notice this before while offshore, throw in the trades, check 12 hours later. Best trades ever. Once a day, maybe every 24 hours...
But I did notice this before while offshore, throw in the trades, check 12 hours later. Best trades ever. Once a day, maybe every 24 hours...
Uczestnik z Sep 04, 2009
879 postów
May 12, 2010 at 17:01
(edytowane May 12, 2010 at 17:02)
Exactly, two fat sells on G/U made the systems day...
but it could have been the other way around and on the reopening there could have been a heavy DD. But it wouldn't matter (no SL there to get hit), since the system is full adaptive it would just trade as usual til TP is reached.
but it could have been the other way around and on the reopening there could have been a heavy DD. But it wouldn't matter (no SL there to get hit), since the system is full adaptive it would just trade as usual til TP is reached.
Uczestnik z Sep 12, 2009
313 postów
May 14, 2010 at 12:26
IT LOOKS LIKE MARTINAGALE BECAUSE TOTAL PIPS Are negative
Uczestnik z Sep 04, 2009
879 postów
May 14, 2010 at 14:12
(edytowane May 14, 2010 at 14:26)
So what? Look at YOUR negative pips... Mine is working at least😝
U can't buy food, cars and houses with pips. I trade to earn MONEY !
U can't buy food, cars and houses with pips. I trade to earn MONEY !
Uczestnik z Feb 25, 2010
29 postów
May 22, 2010 at 13:38
pc8multifx posted:
Exactly, two fat sells on G/U made the systems day...
but it could have been the other way around and on the reopening there could have been a heavy DD. But it wouldn't matter (no SL there to get hit), since the system is full adaptive it would just trade as usual til TP is reached.
Hi Pc8multifx,
During 'heavy' drawdown, is hedge the way your EA keep margin at good levels?
Uczestnik z Sep 04, 2009
879 postów
May 22, 2010 at 14:11
No.
For me the definition of heavy DD(10-15%) is probably different from yours.
For me the definition of heavy DD(10-15%) is probably different from yours.
Uczestnik z Feb 25, 2010
29 postów
May 22, 2010 at 16:08
(edytowane May 22, 2010 at 16:09)
Yes thats possible, let say it this way:
Assume this situation: The price of GBP/USD keeps trending down heavily against your open position in GBP/USD (while your EA has a floating 6th martingale step open in GBP/USD), is hedge the way your EA keep margin still at good levels?
Or perhaps the EA has no hedge capability at all? Wondering how does it maintain good margin level?
Assume this situation: The price of GBP/USD keeps trending down heavily against your open position in GBP/USD (while your EA has a floating 6th martingale step open in GBP/USD), is hedge the way your EA keep margin still at good levels?
Or perhaps the EA has no hedge capability at all? Wondering how does it maintain good margin level?
Uczestnik z Sep 04, 2009
879 postów
May 24, 2010 at 13:57
70% ROI after 92 trading days DD 2.28%😎
Uczestnik z Sep 04, 2009
879 postów
May 31, 2010 at 15:46
Thx. This EA is private and made to managing account
Uczestnik z Sep 04, 2009
879 postów
May 31, 2010 at 16:37
I'll do my very best 😄
Uczestnik z May 16, 2010
9 postów
Jul 02, 2010 at 00:51
Good effort.
You described this system as multi pair adaptive martingale.
It was not clear what you mean with the term 'Adaptive' in regard to this multi pair Martingale?
You described this system as multi pair adaptive martingale.
It was not clear what you mean with the term 'Adaptive' in regard to this multi pair Martingale?
Uczestnik z Sep 04, 2009
879 postów
Jul 02, 2010 at 01:16
The correct English term has to be adaptable, I think. It means, it doesnt trade with a fix pip step, this leads usually to the famous sudden death of marty systems in strong trending market.
Uczestnik z May 01, 2010
272 postów
Jul 03, 2010 at 02:15
(edytowane Jul 03, 2010 at 02:16)
Hi PC8,
How come no REAL accounts for all your systems? They seem good, or do you not risk your own capital?
I see a lot of systems on here that do this and that, but they tend not to run on REAL accounts, and always seem to be seeking outside investor funds. I don't mean to challenge you or bag on you as your returns are great, but curious why the no real MONEY systems are seeking so much capital for managed accounts... :) Or the systems HIDE everything they can which makes no sense for transparency purposes.
Why waste time w/ demo accounts and pretend when you can trade your real dollars and get investors to join you? I know I would if your returns are truly REAL and you can show it and make it easy for all to join. Other systems have strange brokers that are basically resellers, but your systems seem to be quite good. (If you think about it, if you show how much you are trading $$$, what trades you have open, etc.. then you have something people can truly trust)
Do you plan on taking these live in the future?
How come no REAL accounts for all your systems? They seem good, or do you not risk your own capital?
I see a lot of systems on here that do this and that, but they tend not to run on REAL accounts, and always seem to be seeking outside investor funds. I don't mean to challenge you or bag on you as your returns are great, but curious why the no real MONEY systems are seeking so much capital for managed accounts... :) Or the systems HIDE everything they can which makes no sense for transparency purposes.
Why waste time w/ demo accounts and pretend when you can trade your real dollars and get investors to join you? I know I would if your returns are truly REAL and you can show it and make it easy for all to join. Other systems have strange brokers that are basically resellers, but your systems seem to be quite good. (If you think about it, if you show how much you are trading $$$, what trades you have open, etc.. then you have something people can truly trust)
Do you plan on taking these live in the future?
Be Open, honest and ethical and all the $$$ you want will come. (hint hint)
Uczestnik z Sep 04, 2009
879 postów
Jul 14, 2010 at 01:49
7th month, 100 % ROI 😎
Uczestnik z Mar 07, 2010
257 postów
Jul 14, 2010 at 03:17
also you had more systems than 2 ... where did they go ?
