Primeval-ea_FXCL - Starting From 100US$ (By forex_trader_16044)

Lietotājs ir dzēsis šo sistēmu.

Diskusija

Nov 16, 2011 at 05:56
844 Views
3 Replies
forex_trader_16044
Biedrs kopš   70 ieraksti
Jan 07, 2012 at 02:51
Dear Subscribers,


Trading result made between 29th Dec. 2011(The last trading day for FXCL brokerage) and 3rd Jan. 2012(The beginning day for FXCL) is not accurate due to my mistake to suspend the EA before the market close on 29th.
I was careless a lot not knowing the last day of trading of this broker and forgot to stop EA to work...
Except the worst tragedy that happened on that day, Primeval-ea is still on their raise!
Hope continuing tracking the trading results, so far.

Regards,
forex_trader_16044
Biedrs kopš   70 ieraksti
Jan 12, 2012 at 02:23
Dear Subscribers,


The graph data displayed this page seems to be corrupted.
I do not know the precise cause why this happens.
Please refer to the following page for further Primeval-ea's trading results.

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/crescent/primeval-ea-fxcl-from-100us/221883

This page will not be updated any more and will be closed permanently after some grace periods.


Thank you
Biedrs kopš   88 ieraksti
Jan 13, 2012 at 01:44
is this real account with $19k deposit??
forex_trader_16044
Biedrs kopš   70 ieraksti
Jan 13, 2012 at 01:56 (labots Jan 13, 2012 at 01:57)
No, as I stated, something is wrong with this page.
The data shown here is not correct.
I started this trade with 0.96k$ deposit(half of 19k$).
I do not know the reason why this kind of errors sometimes occur on Myfxbook.
Any ideas to avoid such errors?
For the correct trading record, please follow the link below.

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/crescent/primeval-ea-fxcl-from-100us/221883

Thanks
Pieslēgties / Sign Up to comment
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*Spams netiks pieļauts, un tā rezultātā var slēgt kontu.
Tip: Posting an image/youtube url will automatically embed it in your post!
Tip: Type the @ sign to auto complete a username participating in this discussion.