- Sākumlapa
- Kopiena
- Tirdzniecības sistēmas
- FX Amplified - Nick's Account (ForexSignals.com
FX Amplified - Nick's Account (ForexSignals.com (By NickMcDonald)
Lietotājs ir dzēsis šo sistēmu.
Edit Your Comment
Diskusija
Biedrs kopš
1288 ieraksti
Jun 17, 2013 at 06:31
Biedrs kopš
1288 ieraksti
Please provide a subscription link somewhere! I don't know how I subscribed before, but I can't seem to resubscribe!
Biedrs kopš
301 ieraksti
Jun 18, 2013 at 03:24
Biedrs kopš
301 ieraksti
The signal is no longer being sold. They will be putting together a PAMM account soon.
Biedrs kopš
301 ieraksti
Biedrs kopš
301 ieraksti
Biedrs kopš
122 ieraksti
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4378a/4378ad7f0694e9933ed3eeb3d51c63edbc810f01" alt="famisoul famisoul"
forex_trader_118239
Biedrs kopš
21 ieraksti
Biedrs kopš
274 ieraksti
Jul 11, 2013 at 06:58
Biedrs kopš
274 ieraksti
not just july i presume...
Past experience usually helps present self
Biedrs kopš
59 ieraksti
Jul 11, 2013 at 10:54
Biedrs kopš
59 ieraksti
We finally picked up a winner today. The recovery begins :)
Find your passion and work hard
Biedrs kopš
301 ieraksti
Jul 11, 2013 at 13:47
Biedrs kopš
301 ieraksti
NickMcDonald posted:
We finally picked up a winner today. The recovery begins :)
I sure hope so Nick . . . there is a long way to go.
Biedrs kopš
59 ieraksti
Jul 11, 2013 at 14:45
Biedrs kopš
59 ieraksti
A second winner only 20mins ago.
I think we'll be back above watermark high within the next 3-4 weeks.
I think we'll be back above watermark high within the next 3-4 weeks.
Find your passion and work hard
Biedrs kopš
301 ieraksti
Biedrs kopš
85 ieraksti
Jul 16, 2013 at 19:49
Biedrs kopš
85 ieraksti
Aplmustdie posted:
Another wonderful trade . . .
If this trade doesn't win I think I'll stop until new high water mark. Then I can have trust in the trader again.
5-15pip TP with 50+ SL can be 10:1 r/r and that can take a long time to recover if ever.😞
Biedrs kopš
85 ieraksti
Jul 23, 2013 at 13:48
Biedrs kopš
85 ieraksti
shouldn't the drawdown be about 50% and not 25%?
Your account had almost 100% gain ( $8,000 profit ) and now its near 50% gain. Only shows a 25% loss in the month of July while you missed out on 4k profit banked profit 😳
Your account had almost 100% gain ( $8,000 profit ) and now its near 50% gain. Only shows a 25% loss in the month of July while you missed out on 4k profit banked profit 😳
Biedrs kopš
301 ieraksti
Jul 23, 2013 at 17:21
Biedrs kopš
301 ieraksti
uk_max posted:
shouldn't the drawdown be about 50% and not 25%?
Your account had almost 100% gain ( $8,000 profit ) and now its near 50% gain. Only shows a 25% loss in the month of July while you missed out on 4k profit banked profit 😳
Drawdown is based on the size of the entire account, not just the profits.
Biedrs kopš
122 ieraksti
Jul 24, 2013 at 07:54
(labots Jul 24, 2013 at 07:58)
Biedrs kopš
122 ieraksti
hold&pray
the only worse than that is "averaging"
3 months are in the bin already (that is only for those happy ppl which are from the beginning of it...)
the only worse than that is "averaging"
3 months are in the bin already (that is only for those happy ppl which are from the beginning of it...)
Biedrs kopš
122 ieraksti
Biedrs kopš
301 ieraksti
Aug 07, 2013 at 19:27
Biedrs kopš
301 ieraksti
mirusevxs33 posted:
no stops? even mental....????
There's a stop, he just keeps moving it, 😉
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4211b/4211ba867ac0f4a5633344bba5e549fefca85986" alt="superscalper superscalper"
forex_trader_88964
Biedrs kopš
112 ieraksti
Aug 07, 2013 at 19:37
Biedrs kopš
112 ieraksti
I don't understand how some people can follow you really....
Biedrs kopš
23 ieraksti
Aug 07, 2013 at 20:27
Biedrs kopš
23 ieraksti
Guys,
The chart looked pretty, but this drawdown was inevitable. You cant have an average loss 2x your winner. You will ultimately lose money. It means that you need to have 2 winners for very loser just to break even.
You would be better off talking fewer winners and managing your losses. A robust trading system should have the average winner greater than he average loser. If the w/l ratio was in reverse and focused on having each winner 2x each loser, then you would have a sustainable profitable system. 30% drawdown is unsustainable and will happen again using the current methods.
A small change in the w/l % will cause you to lose money under the current system. Everyone looks for the Holy Grail. Well, here it is. Focus on the average winner being greater than the average loser. Thats the Holy Grail. If your average winner was 2x your average loser, you would only need to have 33% winning trades to break even.
Thats the real deal.
The chart looked pretty, but this drawdown was inevitable. You cant have an average loss 2x your winner. You will ultimately lose money. It means that you need to have 2 winners for very loser just to break even.
You would be better off talking fewer winners and managing your losses. A robust trading system should have the average winner greater than he average loser. If the w/l ratio was in reverse and focused on having each winner 2x each loser, then you would have a sustainable profitable system. 30% drawdown is unsustainable and will happen again using the current methods.
A small change in the w/l % will cause you to lose money under the current system. Everyone looks for the Holy Grail. Well, here it is. Focus on the average winner being greater than the average loser. Thats the Holy Grail. If your average winner was 2x your average loser, you would only need to have 33% winning trades to break even.
Thats the real deal.
Biedrs kopš
122 ieraksti
Aug 26, 2013 at 20:07
Biedrs kopš
122 ieraksti
Aplmustdie posted:😲mirusevxs33 posted:
no stops? even mental....????
There's a stop, he just keeps moving it, 😉
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca27c/ca27c3080772d97570c293a029b623454c235d33" alt=""
*Spams netiks pieļauts, un tā rezultātā var slēgt kontu.
Tip: Posting an image/youtube url will automatically embed it in your post!
Tip: Type the @ sign to auto complete a username participating in this discussion.