=EC2= (By Prasono)
| Pieaugums | +98.3M% |
| Kritums (Drawdown) | 0.00% |
| Pipi: | 5152.8 |
| Darījumi | 3559 |
| Uzvaras |
|
| Zaudēt |
|
| Modelis Kvalitāte | 90.0% |
| Stieņi Test | 109790 |
| Ērces Modelētā | 21603117 |
Forward Test is not available
Diskusija
Jun 13, 2010 at 11:52
2,011 Views
8 Replies
Biedrs kopš
71 ieraksti
Jun 13, 2010 at 13:01
hi,
which EA you using?
which EA you using?
Slow and Steady Wins the Race :)
Biedrs kopš
1430 ieraksti
Jun 13, 2010 at 16:58
Nice backtest, what are you risking per trade there?
Looks like about 15% on each trade. Is that right?
Looks like about 15% on each trade. Is that right?
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Biedrs kopš
9 ieraksti
Jun 13, 2010 at 17:42
U have Nice backtest also Steve, less Drawdown
Biedrs kopš
1 ieraksti
Jun 14, 2010 at 23:17
Very nice backtest,have you try on a real account, Mr. Arief? I can talk in 'Bahasa' language.
I am very newbie in forex and ea-user at demo account. I hope i can learn from you all here.
You have very good ea, Mr. Arief. Absolutely.
I am very newbie in forex and ea-user at demo account. I hope i can learn from you all here.
You have very good ea, Mr. Arief. Absolutely.
Biedrs kopš
24 ieraksti
Jun 16, 2010 at 07:00
You will never get the same results live, this back test strategy section should be scrapped as I know for a fact when back testing with Alpari you are getting the spread of a Pro Account for running tests, can't open low deposits accounts on a Pro Account!😲
Suspect all brokers provide better data to use for back tests lulling us in to false sense of security without us knowing what settings are used for the back test
Suspect all brokers provide better data to use for back tests lulling us in to false sense of security without us knowing what settings are used for the back test
Biedrs kopš
1430 ieraksti
Jun 16, 2010 at 07:22
I think most people are aware that backtesting is flawed. There are certain things people can do to get around this. One of which is to obtain better tick data.
I think backtesting is a valid exercise and I have one rule. If it blows up in backtesting it's in the bin. If it passes backtesting then there is half a chance it might work live.
Also the smaller the pip values your EA is dealing with and the shorter the timeframe the higher the discrepancy between the backtest and live trading is likely to be.
I think backtesting is a valid exercise and I have one rule. If it blows up in backtesting it's in the bin. If it passes backtesting then there is half a chance it might work live.
Also the smaller the pip values your EA is dealing with and the shorter the timeframe the higher the discrepancy between the backtest and live trading is likely to be.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Biedrs kopš
216 ieraksti
Jun 21, 2010 at 18:00
Problem with backtesting is that you had historical events taking place, like Hungary, German short suspension etc. History never ever repeats itself, but there is repeating patterns. A trader takes historical events into consideration as he trades. My best trading is done when there is no news, no downgrades , no surprises, just the normal ebb and flow of the market.
Biedrs kopš
9 ieraksti
Oct 03, 2010 at 06:04
What's the Ea?
Biedrs kopš
4 ieraksti
Jan 29, 2011 at 16:01
he can you help me please.
*Spams netiks pieļauts, un tā rezultātā var slēgt kontu.
Tip: Posting an image/youtube url will automatically embed it in your post!
Tip: Type the @ sign to auto complete a username participating in this discussion.
